Skip to main content

Security report for dpcdemokratpidie.id

DPC Partai Demokrat Bantuan untuk Korban Bencana · Government · Indonesia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website dpcdemokratpidie.id represents the local branch of the Democratic Party in Pidie, Indonesia, focusing on humanitarian aid for disaster victims. It provides information about aid distribution and community support, positioning itself as a responsive political entity in the region. The site is built on WordPress with a standard theme and uses Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services. The technical infrastructure is modern and supports mobile responsiveness and SEO best practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer lock enabled, but lacks DNSSEC and advanced security headers. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. No direct contact information or incident response details are provided, which may affect user trust and regulatory compliance. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy, security, and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dpcdemokratpidie.id

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site serves as a communication and information platform for a political party branch engaged in social welfare activities. Its market position is local and community-focused, targeting residents affected by natural disasters in Pidie. The business model is non-profit and politically oriented, relying on community engagement and aid distribution. The content strategy includes regular blog posts about social services and government programs, enhancing community awareness. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but the site links to numerous related government and social service domains, suggesting a broad network. Growth indicators include active content updates and structured data usage. Strategic observations highlight the need for improved privacy compliance and contact accessibility to strengthen credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer lock is active, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduce the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site does not appear to have a formal security policy or incident response plan publicly available. Data protection practices are minimal, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The security culture appears nascent, typical for small political or non-profit websites. Enhancements in security headers, DNSSEC, and transparency about security policies would improve resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Add visible and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance trust and user support.
  5. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan to demonstrate commitment to security and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DPC Partai Demokrat Bantuan untuk Korban Bencana
Description
DPC Partai Demokrat Pidie sigap menyalurkan bantuan kemanusiaan bagi korban bencana alam di wilayah Pidie. Bantuan berupa sembako, obat-obatan, dan kebutuhan darurat lainnya disalurkan langsung ke lokasi terdampak sebagai bentuk kepedulian dan solidaritas partai terhadap masyarakat. Ini adalah komitmen nyata Demokrat untuk selalu hadir di saat rakyat membutuhkan.
Key services
Humanitarian aid distribution, Community support, Political engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery 3.7.1, Yoast SEO plugin
Frameworks
WordPress Twenty Seventeen theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain transfer lock enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based site for a local political party branch focused on humanitarian aid.
  2. Content is rich with multiple posts about social services and government-related topics.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage or posts.
  5. No visible security or incident response policies.
  6. Site uses Cloudflare DNS but no DNSSEC.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Good SEO metadata and structured data present.
  9. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 using the Twenty Seventeen theme, a widely used and stable platform. It employs jQuery 3.7.1 and the Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and DNS services but without DNSSEC enabled. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and breadcrumb. Performance is moderate, with deferred JavaScript loading and optimized images. Accessibility is basic but functional. The technical debt appears low, but the site could benefit from modern security enhancements and privacy compliance features to reduce risk and improve user confidence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dpcdemokratpidie.id. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dpcdemokratpidie.id.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.