Skip to main content

Security report for door2door.com.br

Other · Brazil

Partial score · DNS & email only

51/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website door2door.com.br represents a small Brazilian business operating an e-commerce platform built on WordPress using the Astra theme and SureCart plugin. The site is accessible without any WAF or security blocking mechanisms, indicating open availability. However, the content is minimal and lacks explicit business descriptions, contact information, or privacy and security policies. The technical infrastructure is standard for small to medium WordPress sites, hosted on Locaweb, a Brazilian hosting provider, which aligns with the domain's WHOIS data. Security posture is weak due to the absence of security headers and policies, and privacy compliance is minimal with no visible cookie or privacy policies. Overall, the site appears to be in early stages or limited in public-facing content and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching door2door.com.br

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
51

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to be a small e-commerce operator targeting Brazilian customers, leveraging WordPress and SureCart for online sales. The lack of detailed business information, contact details, or certifications limits the ability to assess market positioning or competitive advantages. The domain registration and hosting are consistent with a Brazilian small business. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The business model likely revolves around direct online sales, but specifics are not disclosed on the site.

Security posture

Security maturity is low. The site lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others. There is no evidence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. HTTPS status is unknown from the data but should be verified and enforced. No analytics or tracking scripts that could pose privacy risks were detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, the site is vulnerable to common web security risks and lacks transparency in security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration and enforce it site-wide.
  2. Add essential security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and consider adding a security.txt file to improve transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, SureCart plugin, Astra theme, Google Fonts, JavaScript
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the HTML content
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found or labeled
  4. Website uses WordPress CMS with Astra theme and SureCart plugin for e-commerce functionality
  5. No security headers or advanced security policies detected
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond standard WordPress emoji scripts
  7. Content is minimal and mostly technical CSS/JS and theme related; no business descriptive content found
  8. No social media links or business certifications found
  9. WHOIS data shows domain uses Locaweb name servers, consistent with Brazilian hosting
  10. Website appears to be a small business or startup with limited public information
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with the Astra theme and SureCart e-commerce plugin, indicating a standard and maintainable technical stack. Hosting is provided by Locaweb, a reputable Brazilian hosting provider. The site includes Google Fonts and standard WordPress emoji scripts. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Mobile optimization is good due to responsive theme design. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic, with room for improvement in metadata and structured data usage. No advanced frameworks or custom technologies were detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with door2door.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review door2door.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.