Skip to main content

Security report for donstick.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Donstick.com operates as an advertising platform specializing in banner impressions sourced from a large network of over 800 adult content websites. The site targets advertisers seeking to reach adult audiences through explicit content channels. The business model focuses on monetizing adult traffic via banner ads, leveraging a niche market within the adult entertainment industry. The website itself is minimalistic, serving primarily as a landing page to promote the advertising network's reach and traffic volume. From a technical perspective, the website shows limited sophistication. There is no evidence of modern frameworks, CMS, or advanced SEO and accessibility features. Hosting is provided by hostiservices.com, and the domain is registered with Danesco Trading Ltd. since 2016, indicating a stable but basic infrastructure. The site lacks HTTPS information and security headers, which suggests potential vulnerabilities and a lack of adherence to modern web security standards. Security posture is weak, with no visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, and no contact or incident response information. The absence of these elements, combined with the adult nature of the content, raises compliance and trust concerns. The site does not implement GDPR compliance mechanisms or user consent management. Overall, the security score is low, and the site would benefit from significant improvements in security and privacy practices. The overall risk assessment indicates a low trustworthiness level due to poor content quality, lack of transparency, and minimal security controls. Strategic recommendations include enabling HTTPS, adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, improving mobile and accessibility features, and providing clear contact and incident response channels to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching donstick.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Donstick.com occupies a niche position as an adult advertising network, leveraging a large portfolio of pornographic websites to offer banner impressions to advertisers. Its competitive advantage lies in the volume and specificity of adult traffic it can deliver. The business model is primarily traffic monetization through advertising, targeting advertisers in the adult entertainment sector. Revenue streams likely include pay-per-impression or pay-per-click advertising fees. The target customer segment is advertisers seeking adult audience exposure. Growth indicators are not evident from the site content, and no partnerships or parent/subsidiary relationships are disclosed. The site’s minimalistic approach and lack of professional branding limit its market presence and credibility.

Security posture

The security maturity level of donstick.com is low. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes users to potential interception and attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response readiness. The lack of contact information for security or abuse reporting further weakens the security posture. The site’s adult content nature increases the importance of robust security and privacy controls, which are currently lacking. Business impact of these vulnerabilities includes reputational damage and potential regulatory penalties.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance transparency.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Add clear contact information including security and abuse reporting channels.
  5. Improve website design, mobile optimization, and accessibility to enhance user experience and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Advertising service offering banner impressions from a network of 800+ pornographic websites with over 15 million total visitors and 2+ million search engine traffic.
Key services
banner impressions, traffic sourcing from adult websites
Content quality
basic
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Delitraff.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple landing page advertising banner impressions from a large network of adult websites.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms present.
  4. No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
  5. Content is adult-oriented with explicit keywords and no age verification.
  6. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is moderately aged.
  7. Technical implementation is minimal with poor SEO and accessibility.
  8. Advertising transparency is poor with no clear tracking or affiliate disclosures.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on servers using hostiservices.com name servers and registered through Danesco Trading Ltd. The technical stack is minimal with no detected CMS or frameworks. The HTML content is basic and lacks meta tags beyond a title and a single meta tag unrelated to SEO or social media. There are no scripts or analytics services detected. Performance is likely moderate due to minimal content but lacks optimization for mobile and accessibility. The site does not implement modern SEO best practices or structured data. Technical risks include lack of HTTPS and security headers, which could expose the site to man-in-the-middle attacks and reduce search engine ranking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with donstick.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review donstick.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.