Skip to main content

Security report for domina.lv

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain domina.lv currently hosts a parked domain page indicating it is for sale, with no active business or service content. The website primarily serves as an advertising placeholder with Google Ads integration. There is no identifiable company or business information, and no contact details are provided. The site lacks substantive content, branding, or trust indicators, limiting its business credibility. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Google advertising scripts. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. The site is moderately optimized for mobile but lacks accessibility and SEO best practices. Security measures such as HTTPS and security headers are not verifiable from the provided data, and no forms or user inputs are present. Security posture is minimal with no visible vulnerabilities but also no advanced protections. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and terms of service pages but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR indicators. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy assessment, but the parked status and domain-for-sale message suggest no active business use. Overall, the site presents a low-risk profile but also low trust and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include improving transparency, adding contact information, implementing security best practices, and enhancing privacy compliance if the domain is to be developed into an active business site.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching domina.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain domina.lv is positioned as a domain-for-sale asset rather than an active business. There is no evidence of a company operating under this domain or providing services. The business model is domain resale, targeting domain investors or buyers. There are no partnerships, subsidiaries, or market positioning indicators. The lack of business information and contact details limits competitive analysis and growth insights. The site’s revenue likely derives from advertising impressions rather than direct sales or services.

Security posture

The website exhibits a minimal security posture with no detected HTTPS enforcement or security headers. No forms or user data collection points reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. The absence of incident response contacts, security policies, or vulnerability disclosures indicates low security maturity. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy but no cookie consent or GDPR-specific measures. The domain’s parked status reduces immediate security risks but also reflects a lack of proactive security management.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all traffic.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information and business details to improve trust and credibility.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Develop a comprehensive privacy and security policy including incident response contacts.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website is a parked domain page indicating the domain domina.lv is for sale. It does not provide business or service information.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Ads, Google AdSense, Google Syndicated Search
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Google Ads cookie.js
Marketing tools
Google Syndicated Search
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain page with no active business content.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. No contact information or company details provided.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies exist but are minimal.
  5. Advertising scripts from Google are present indicating monetization attempts.
  6. No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  7. No forms or user input fields present.
  8. No social media or external business-related links found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, incorporating Google Ads and Syndicated Search scripts for monetization. There is no detected CMS or advanced framework. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. SEO is poor due to minimal meta tags and lack of content. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the data. The site is simple but lacks modern technical sophistication.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with domina.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review domina.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.