Skip to main content

Security report for dodies.lv

Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website vesture.dodies.lv is a specialized platform offering historical maps and panoramic views focused on Latvia. It targets users interested in Latvian history and geography, providing map visualizations and related geographic data overlays. The site uses modern web technologies including React and Leaflet.js for interactive mapping, and FontAwesome for icons. The technical infrastructure appears moderately optimized with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts its compliance posture. Security headers are not detected in the provided HTML, and no contact or incident response information is available, which could hinder trust and security incident handling. Overall, the site is safe with no adult or malicious content detected, but improvements in security and privacy compliance are recommended to enhance trustworthiness and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dodies.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform operates in a niche market segment providing historical and geographic information services related to Latvia. Its business model appears informational, likely supported by public interest or community engagement rather than direct commercial transactions. The target audience includes history enthusiasts, researchers, and the general public interested in Latvian heritage. The site leverages partnerships or external services for map tiles and elevation data, as indicated by external domains. There is no evidence of extensive marketing, advertising, or analytics integration, suggesting a focus on content delivery rather than monetization. The lack of WHOIS data limits insights into ownership and corporate structure, but the site’s content and technical setup suggest a small-scale operation with moderate market presence.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate but with notable gaps. HTTPS usage is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the provided data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security are detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance issues with GDPR and related regulations. No forms or input fields were found, reducing the attack surface but also limiting user interaction. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a best practice for handling security incidents. Overall, the site is low risk in terms of vulnerabilities but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to maintain security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website providing historical maps and panoramas for Latvia, targeting users interested in history and geography.
Key services
Historical map visualization, Panorama views, Geographical data overlays
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Leaflet.js, FontAwesome
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides a specialized service focused on Latvian historical maps.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the HTML content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content.
  5. Uses modern JavaScript frameworks and mapping libraries.
  6. No signs of adult or malicious content.
  7. No security headers detected in the HTML snippet.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  10. External resources are mostly related to map tile servers and font icons.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with React framework and Leaflet.js for interactive maps. External resources include map tile servers and icon fonts. The site appears to have moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO metadata is minimal, with no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected in the provided HTML snippet. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The site does not appear to use common analytics or marketing tools, indicating a focus on content delivery rather than user tracking or advertising. Technical debt appears low but opportunities exist to enhance SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dodies.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dodies.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.