Skip to main content

Security report for documenta-pannonica.si

Other · Slovenia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.documenta-pannonica.si serves as a cross-border cultural heritage database focusing on 120 selected locations in the Slovenian-Hungarian border region, specifically Prekmurje in Slovenia and the Železna županija in Hungary. It provides detailed information on archival materials, immovable and intangible cultural heritage, notable personalities, and audio-visual content. The platform targets researchers, historians, and cultural enthusiasts interested in this niche area. The multilingual support (Slovenian, Hungarian, English) enhances accessibility for a broader audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins for multilingual content and GDPR cookie compliance, hosted by a Slovenian provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or security policies. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics with moderate user tracking. Overall, the site is professionally designed with consistent branding and trustworthy content, though it would benefit from enhanced privacy documentation and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching documenta-pannonica.si

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project appears to be a specialized cultural heritage informational platform, likely non-commercial, aimed at preserving and disseminating knowledge about the Slovenian-Hungarian border region's cultural assets. Its market position is niche, serving academic and cultural sectors. The business model is informational and educational, possibly funded by cultural or governmental grants. The presence of partner domains for Hungarian and English versions indicates a collaborative multilingual approach. The lack of explicit business contact information and commercial elements suggests a focus on public service rather than profit. The platform's growth potential lies in expanding its database and enhancing user engagement through multilingual content and interactive maps.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, and uses a cookie consent mechanism aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and security policies is a compliance gap. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of common WordPress plugins introduces potential risks if not regularly updated. No security headers were detected in the HTML, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved by adding formal policies, security headers, and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, usage, and user rights.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy documentation to enhance transparency and legal compliance.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Čezmejna baza podatkov o kulturni dediščini izbranih 120 krajev na čezmejnem slovensko-madžarskem območju - Prekmurja v Sloveniji in Železne županije na Madžarskem.
Key services
Database of cultural heritage items, Information on archival materials, Information on immovable and intangible cultural heritage, Profiles of personalities, Audio-visual materials
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Leaflet.js, Font Awesome, Site Kit by Google, WPML (WordPress Multilingual Plugin), GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin, WP Rocket (performance optimization)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of deferred and minified JS and CSS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a multilingual cultural heritage database focused on Slovenian-Hungarian cross-border region.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for multilingual support and GDPR compliance.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content.
  6. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking.
  7. No security headers detected in the HTML content; potential area for improvement.
  8. Website content is safe and educational with no adult or questionable content.
  9. Domain registration is consistent and legitimate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform, utilizing jQuery, Leaflet.js for interactive maps, Font Awesome for icons, and Google Site Kit for analytics integration. The site uses WPML for multilingual content management and a GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin for privacy consent. Performance optimizations include WP Rocket for caching and minification of CSS and JS assets. The site is hosted by HITROST.COM, a Slovenian hosting provider. The technical implementation is modern but could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and security hardening. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities and lack of security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with documenta-pannonica.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review documenta-pannonica.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.