Skip to main content

Security report for dobrybip.pl

ESC S.A. · Government · Poland

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ESC S.A. operates the DobryBIP.pl website, offering a specialized Biuletyn Informacji Publicznej (BIP) system tailored for Polish public institutions. The company positions itself as a reliable provider of government-focused software solutions, emphasizing usability, mobile responsiveness, and compliance with accessibility standards. The website features client testimonials and reference letters, reinforcing its credibility in the public sector market. The target audience primarily includes municipal and governmental offices in Poland seeking efficient public information management tools. Technically, the website employs a mix of legacy and modern web technologies including jQuery 1.11.3, Bootstrap, Google Maps API, and Google reCAPTCHA for security on forms. While the design is professional and mobile-optimized, the use of outdated JavaScript libraries presents potential security risks. The site includes a cookie consent mechanism and basic SEO metadata but lacks structured data and comprehensive privacy or terms of service documentation. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements Google reCAPTCHA to protect its contact forms. However, no security headers were detected in the provided data, and the outdated jQuery version could expose the site to vulnerabilities. There is no public security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness visibility. The WHOIS data aligns well with the website's claims, showing a legitimate registration under ESC S.A. in Poland. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and trustworthy for its niche audience but would benefit from updating its technical stack, enhancing security headers, and publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dobrybip.pl

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ESC S.A. targets the government sector in Poland with a niche product focused on public information bulletin management. Their competitive advantage lies in a tailored, easy-to-use BIP system that complies with accessibility standards and supports mobile devices. The business model likely involves licensing or SaaS offerings to public institutions. The presence of client testimonials and reference letters indicates a stable customer base and positive reputation. Partnerships with development firms like Vela.net.pl suggest a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators include a test version sign-up count and ongoing client engagements. Strategic observations highlight the need for modernization of technical components and enhanced compliance documentation to maintain market leadership.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. The use of HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA are positive controls, but the absence of security headers and the use of an outdated jQuery version introduce vulnerabilities. No explicit security or incident response policies are publicly available, which is a compliance gap especially under GDPR and NIS2 frameworks. Data protection practices are partially implemented but could be improved by publishing clear policies and enhancing technical defenses. Incident response readiness is unknown due to lack of public information. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalization and modernization.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service documents to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Develop and disclose a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate vulnerabilities proactively.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ESC S.A.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ESC S.A.
Description
Nowy ulepszony BIP+ system stworzony od podstaw, zoptymalizowany pod względem użyteczności i prosty w obsłudze, łączący funkcjonalność i atrakcyjną grafikę, poprawnie wyświetlający się na urządzeniach mobilnych.
Key services
BIP system software, Content management system for public information, Customization and support services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.3, Modernizr 1.6, Bootstrap, Google Maps API, Google reCAPTCHA v2, bxSlider, AOS (Animate On Scroll)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Content is focused on a specialized BIP system for Polish public institutions.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels.
  4. No privacy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  5. Use of some outdated JavaScript libraries may pose security risks.
  6. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response information publicly available.
  8. Google Analytics is used for tracking with moderate user tracking level.
  9. Design and UX are professional and consistent with government sector standards.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS with a technology stack including jQuery 1.11.3, Bootstrap, Google Maps API, and Google reCAPTCHA. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly with good accessibility compliance (WCAG 2.0). Performance is moderate, with some legacy scripts that could impact speed and security. SEO is basic with meta description but lacks structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. The site uses Google Fonts and bxSlider for UI elements. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. There is opportunity to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance SEO and accessibility further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dobrybip.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dobrybip.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.