Skip to main content

Security report for dobosch.com

Other · Japan

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.dobosch.com is a Japanese language content platform focused on facial esthetic treatments and salons in Fukuoka, Japan. It provides detailed descriptions of various facial skincare procedures and promotes local beauty services. The site appears to be a niche recommendation or affiliate content site targeting consumers interested in facial esthetics. Technically, the site uses standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with some tracking scripts for analytics. However, it lacks modern security headers and privacy compliance features such as privacy and cookie policies. The absence of contact information and WHOIS registration data raises concerns about business transparency and legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional but has significant gaps in security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dobosch.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dobosch.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
100%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for dobosch.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model appears to be content-driven, likely monetized through affiliate marketing or advertising, targeting a localized Japanese market interested in beauty and skincare. The site does not provide explicit company or legal information, which limits trust and credibility. The external links to various unrelated domains suggest possible affiliate partnerships but no clear business partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The site’s market position is niche and localized with moderate content quality but limited branding consistency and trust signals.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected. There is no evidence of privacy or cookie policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The lack of WHOIS data and registrant information further reduces trust. Tracking scripts are present, but privacy compliance is poor. The site would benefit from implementing standard security headers, privacy policies, and transparent contact information to improve security maturity and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Add clear contact information including company email and phone number to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  3. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Verify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file and provide incident response contact channels.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides detailed information and recommendations about facial esthetic salons and clinics in Fukuoka, Japan, focusing on facial skincare treatments such as cleansing, pore cleaning, peeling, photo facials, radio frequency treatments, facial massage, and moisturizing treatments. It highlights the appeal of Fukuoka as a city for beauty and wellness, emphasizing local food culture and lifestyle benefits.
Key services
Facial esthetic treatment information, Salon recommendations, Beauty and skincare advice
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
analyze.pro.research-artisan.com
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses are provided on the site.
  4. The site uses Japanese language and targets facial esthetic services in Fukuoka.
  5. External links point to various unrelated domains, possibly affiliate or advertising links.
  6. Tracking scripts from Research Artisan Pro are present, indicating user analytics and tracking.
  7. No social media links or official company contact details found.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered in the raw WHOIS output.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript technologies without any detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The site includes a JSON-LD breadcrumb structured data snippet for SEO. Performance appears moderate with no explicit hosting or CDN information. Mobile optimization is basic but present. SEO is basic with meta viewport and canonical tags but lacks Open Graph or Twitter Card metadata. Accessibility features are minimal. The site uses a third-party analytics service (Research Artisan Pro) with tracking scripts and pixels. There is room for modernization and improved technical SEO and security implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dobosch.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dobosch.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.