Skip to main content

Security report for dobnica.lv

DOBNĪCA · Other · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DOBNĪCA is a small Latvian business offering interactive garden plot rentals near the Daugava river, targeting individuals interested in ecological gardening but lacking time for continuous garden maintenance. The website presents a clear business model with detailed service descriptions, including garden rental, maintenance options, and vegetable/herb seedling packages. The site uses modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking. While the website is professionally designed with good navigation and mobile optimization, it lacks privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with no visible vulnerabilities but missing security headers and formal security policies. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is functional, relevant, and safe for general audiences, but improvements in privacy compliance and security headers are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dobnica.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DOBNĪCA operates in a niche local market providing garden rental services with ecological produce cultivation options. Its competitive advantage lies in offering flexible garden maintenance services and detailed customer engagement through notifications. The business model relies on seasonal rentals and additional service packages, targeting environmentally conscious individuals with limited gardening time. The company maintains active social media presence on Facebook and Instagram, enhancing community engagement. Growth potential exists in expanding service offerings and improving digital compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms are present to assess input security, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which may expose the business to regulatory risks under GDPR. The use of Google Analytics indicates moderate user tracking without visible consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance web security.
  3. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to build trust and prepare for incident response.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and analytics tools to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a data protection officer contact or privacy contact information to demonstrate commitment to data protection.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DOBNĪCA
Description
DOBNĪCA is an interactive garden rental service located near the Daugava river, offering customers the ability to rent and cultivate their own garden plots (approximately 50m²) with options to self-manage or delegate maintenance to the DOBNĪCA team. The service targets modern individuals seeking ecological products and nature engagement but lacking time for continuous garden upkeep.
Key services
Garden plot rental, Garden maintenance services, Vegetable and herb seedling packages, Garden tools rental, Customer notifications about garden status
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.2.1, jQuery 3.3.1, Popper.js, FontAwesome 5.7.2, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, fullPage.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (due to URL https://dobnica.lv/)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
  4. Clear contact information including email, phone, and physical address provided.
  5. Use of modern frontend technologies and analytics tools detected.
  6. No forms present on main pages; minimal data collection observed.
  7. No security headers detected in HTML source; security posture can be improved.
  8. Content is relevant, professional, and targeted at local ecological garden rental market.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap 4.2.1, jQuery 3.3.1, Popper.js, and FontAwesome 5.7.2, indicating a modern but not cutting-edge frontend stack. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and content structure. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading. Accessibility features are basic but present. The absence of security headers and privacy policies suggests technical debt in security and compliance areas. There are no visible forms or complex backend integrations in the HTML content provided.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dobnica.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dobnica.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.