DM Polygraphy Ltd. is a Latvia-based small manufacturing company specializing in self-adhesive labels, packaging, and industrial 3D printing services. The company serves clients across the European Union and internationally, including countries such as Germany, France, Spain, Portugal, South Africa, and the USA. Their business model focuses on providing high-quality printing products and custom design services at competitive prices, targeting sectors like beverages, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and retail. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content.
Technically, the website employs a modern but somewhat dated technology stack including Bootstrap 3.3.7 and jQuery 3.2.1, with integration of Google Fonts, Yandex Metrika, and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. The hosting and domain registration are stable and consistent with the business profile.
From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has client-side validation on its contact form but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS. DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Analytics usage is moderate with common tracking tools but no visible consent mechanisms.
Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance improvements, and explicit policy disclosures to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
High
No SPF record found
SPF helps prevent email spoofing
What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
40
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention dmpolygraphy.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for dmpolygraphy.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
DM Polygraphy Ltd. occupies a niche in the manufacturing and design sector focused on labels and packaging, with a growing footprint in industrial 3D printing. Their competitive advantage lies in offering customized design services combined with a broad product range including self-adhesive labels, double-sided labels, shrink sleeves, and cardboard packaging. The company targets diverse sectors such as alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and retail, indicating a diversified customer base. Partnerships with recognized industry players like UPM and Avery Dennison enhance their supply chain credibility. The business model is B2B with international reach, supported by a small but focused operational size. Growth indicators include active participation in trade shows and certifications such as the LIAA certificate. Strategic observations suggest opportunities for expanding digital presence and improving compliance to support scaling efforts.
Security posture
The current security posture of the website is moderate but with notable gaps. HTTPS is presumably enforced, which is fundamental. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and content injection. The lack of DNSSEC leaves DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing. No privacy or cookie policies and no consent mechanisms expose the company to GDPR compliance risks. The contact form uses client-side validation but lacks visible server-side security measures or anti-spam protections. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure channels are provided, limiting the ability to manage security incidents effectively. Overall, the security culture appears basic and would benefit from a structured security framework adoption and enhanced technical controls.
Recommendations
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and integrity.
Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms.
Establish an incident response process and provide clear security contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
Conduct a security audit of the contact form and backend to ensure secure data handling and prevent injection or spam attacks.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
DM Polygraphy Ltd.
Description
Production of self-adhesive labels and packaging, as well as provision of customer-specific design services. High-quality 3D print for industrial use.
Key services
Self-adhesive labels, Packaging, Design development services, High-quality industrial 3D printing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery 3.2.1, Google Fonts (Montserrat, Source Sans Pro), Yandex Metrika, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
Use of HTTPS assumed (not explicitly stated but Google Analytics and Yandex scripts loaded via HTTPS)
Contact form with validation scripts
Analytics and tracking
Services
Yandex Metrika, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
Yandex Metrika
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
Contact information is clearly presented with multiple contact methods
Use of modern frontend technologies but older Bootstrap version
No explicit security headers detected
Domain registration is stable and consistent with business claims
Website content is professional and relevant to manufacturing and design services
Analytics tools used are common but no explicit privacy notices
No social media links detected
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a stable but somewhat outdated frontend technology stack with Bootstrap 3.3.7 and jQuery 3.2.1, which may pose maintenance challenges. Integration of Google Fonts and analytics tools is standard. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting details are limited but domain registration is stable with a reputable registrar. Performance is moderate with no critical errors but could be improved by updating libraries and optimizing assets. Accessibility is basic and could be enhanced to meet modern standards. No CMS detected, indicating a custom or static site architecture. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports business needs but modernization and security hardening are recommended.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with dmpolygraphy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dmpolygraphy.com.