Skip to main content

Security report for dlhyogyakarta.org

Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kota Yogyakarta · Government · Indonesia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website dlhyogyakarta.org serves as the official online presence of the Environmental Agency (Dinas Lingkungan Hidup) of Yogyakarta City, Indonesia. It provides comprehensive public information, news updates, program details, and public service resources related to environmental management and sustainability initiatives in the region. The site targets local residents, government officials, and environmental stakeholders, positioning itself as a trusted government resource. Technically, the website employs modern front-end technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, Flickity, and Slick carousel, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience across devices. Hosting and DNS services are managed via Cloudflare, enhancing availability and performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections, but lacks DNSSEC and advanced security headers. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. The WHOIS data reveals inconsistencies, notably a domain creation date set in the future, which conflicts with the website's content timestamps and raises legitimacy concerns. Overall, the site is professionally designed, content-rich, and trustworthy in appearance but would benefit from improved transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dlhyogyakarta.org

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Environmental Agency of Yogyakarta City operates as a government entity focused on environmental governance, public education, and service delivery. Its business model revolves around public sector service provision rather than commercial revenue generation. The website reflects a medium-sized government operation with active engagement through news, agendas, and public contact channels. Partnerships are indicated via related subdomains, such as procurement services. The agency leverages digital tools to disseminate information and engage the community but lacks advanced analytics or marketing integrations. Growth indicators include regular content updates and multimedia integration (YouTube playlists). Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance trust through transparent policies and improved domain registration practices.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer restrictions in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options limits protection against DNS spoofing and clickjacking attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which may hinder timely security issue reporting and resolution. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with data protection regulations like GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve transparency and regulatory compliance.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide clear incident response contact channels to enhance security readiness.
  5. Review and correct domain registration details to resolve inconsistencies and improve trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kota Yogyakarta
Description
Official website of the Environmental Agency of Yogyakarta City, providing public information, news, programs, public services, and contact details related to environmental management in Yogyakarta.
Key services
Public information dissemination, Environmental programs and initiatives, Public service standards and complaint management, News and announcements, Educational and training agenda
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Flickity carousel, Slick carousel, Font Awesome, SweetAlert2
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized transfers

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented.
  4. Website uses modern front-end libraries and frameworks.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. No explicit security headers or advanced security policies observed.
  7. WHOIS data is inconsistent and suspicious due to future domain creation date.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information available.
  9. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  10. Branding and content quality are good and consistent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom or unknown CMS platform utilizing popular front-end libraries including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Flickity and Slick for carousel functionality, and Font Awesome for icons. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, which likely improve performance and availability. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs such as Google Fonts and jsDelivr. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring usability across devices. SEO is basic with canonical links and meta tags present but could be enhanced with structured data. Accessibility features are minimal but present. No major technical debt or broken elements were observed. Opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and enhance privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dlhyogyakarta.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dlhyogyakarta.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.