Skip to main content

Security report for dlhdepok.id

Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kota Depok · Government · Indonesia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kota Depok is the official government agency responsible for environmental management in Depok city, Indonesia. The website serves as a public information portal providing services such as environmental permits, waste management, and public complaint reporting. The agency operates under local government regulations and targets local citizens and stakeholders interested in environmental governance. Technically, the website is built with standard web technologies, uses HTTPS, and is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, lack of security headers, and no incident response information highlight areas for improvement in security and compliance. The domain WHOIS data shows a future creation date, which is inconsistent with the agency's founding year, suggesting a data anomaly but not necessarily a legitimacy issue. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dlhdepok.id

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency holds a strong market position as a government entity providing essential environmental services. Its business model is public service oriented, funded and operated by local government. The website's ecosystem includes links to related government services and partner domains such as oss.go.id and amdalnet.menlhk.go.id. The target audience includes local residents, businesses requiring environmental permits, and government stakeholders. The website content and structure support transparency and public engagement but lack advanced digital marketing or analytics tools, reflecting a focus on service rather than commercial growth.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security hygiene with HTTPS and domain transfer protection. However, the lack of DNSSEC, missing security headers, and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate a low to moderate security maturity. No vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the content. The site would benefit from implementing DNSSEC, security headers, and publishing security and privacy policies to enhance trust and compliance with regulations such as GDPR.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS infrastructure and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  4. Publish an incident response policy with dedicated security contact channels.
  5. Review and correct domain WHOIS data to reflect accurate creation date.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kota Depok
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kota Depok
Description
Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kota Depok is the leading government sector responsible for environmental affairs in Depok city, Indonesia. It operates under local government regulations and is tasked with managing environmental governance, forestry, and public works related to waste management.
Key services
Environmental governance, Waste management, Public service information, Permit information, Environmental impact assessment (Amdalnet), Public complaint reporting (Lapor)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official government environmental agency website for Depok city
  2. Clear contact information with phone, email, and physical address
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No security or incident response policies published
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  6. Website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS
  7. Domain WHOIS data shows future creation date, possibly erroneous
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  9. Content is safe and appropriate for general audience
  10. Website design and navigation are good and professional
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom or unknown CMS with standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It loads Google Fonts and uses Cloudflare for DNS and likely CDN services. The site is mobile responsive and has good navigation and design quality. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images implemented. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal but functional. There is no evidence of third-party analytics or tracking scripts, indicating a privacy-conscious approach or limited digital marketing focus.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dlhdepok.id. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dlhdepok.id.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.