Skip to main content

Security report for dlhcimahi.org

Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kota Cimahi · Government · Indonesia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kota Cimahi operates as the official environmental agency for Cimahi City, Indonesia, providing public information, environmental programs, and public services through its website. The site targets local residents, government officials, and environmental stakeholders, offering news updates, agendas, and contact channels. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Flickity, and Slick Carousel, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience. However, SEO and accessibility features are basic, and performance is moderate. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks advanced security headers and formal policies such as privacy or cookie consent. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification, though the official branding and content suggest a legitimate government entity. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dlhcimahi.org

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a small government entity focused on environmental management in Cimahi City. It serves as a communication and service platform rather than a commercial business, with no evident revenue streams or commercial partnerships beyond related government services. The presence of a procurement subdomain indicates operational partnerships within government functions. The target audience is primarily local citizens and government stakeholders. The site’s content and structure support transparency and public engagement, though the absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests room for compliance improvement. The digital maturity is moderate, with opportunities to enhance SEO, accessibility, and security frameworks.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. The use of reputable external libraries reduces risk, but the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a government informational site but requires enhancements to meet higher standards and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly update all third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kota Cimahi
Description
Official government website for the Environmental Agency of Cimahi City, Indonesia, providing public information, news, programs, public services, and contact details related to environmental management.
Key services
Public information dissemination, Environmental program updates, Public service standards and complaints management, Event and agenda announcements, Educational content and training, Contact and support services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Flickity, Slick Carousel, Font Awesome, SweetAlert2
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure external libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is official government agency site for environmental management in Cimahi City, Indonesia.
  2. Content is rich with news, programs, public services, and contact info.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy present.
  6. Use of modern JS libraries and frameworks but no advanced SEO or accessibility features detected.
  7. No advertising or tracking detected, indicating privacy-friendly approach.
  8. Contact info includes email, phone, physical address, and embedded Google Maps.
  9. Social media presence on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram with official links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, Flickity, and Slick Carousel for UI components and interactivity, indicating a modern but somewhat traditional front-end stack. The site is mobile responsive and loads external fonts and icons from trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate, with some heavy image usage (e.g., large banners) that could be optimized. SEO is basic with canonical tags and meta viewport but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility is basic, with no ARIA landmarks or enhanced keyboard navigation detected. Hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dlhcimahi.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dlhcimahi.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.