Skip to main content

Security report for diviblock.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website diviblock.com currently serves a single purpose: to block browser inspect tools with a message instructing users to close such tools and refresh the page. There is no accessible business content, product information, or service descriptions. The domain is registered via NameCheap since 2020, indicating a relatively recent but stable registration. The site appears to be related to a WordPress plugin or tool designed to prevent inspection of website code, but no further business details are provided. Technically, the site uses WordPress and Google Fonts but lacks visible security headers or HTTPS confirmation in the provided data. The security posture is minimal, with DNSSEC not enabled and no privacy or cookie policies present. Overall, the site is low in content quality and business credibility due to the lack of accessible information and blocking mechanisms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching diviblock.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention diviblock.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for diviblock.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content, no detailed business intelligence can be derived. The domain age and registrar suggest a legitimate small business or individual owner. The site likely targets website owners or developers interested in preventing code inspection, possibly as a niche security or privacy tool. No partnerships, certifications, or contact channels are evident. The business model appears to be focused on providing a plugin or service related to browser inspection blocking, but this cannot be confirmed from the current content.

Security posture

The security posture is weak to moderate. The domain has clientTransferProhibited status, which protects against unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no HTTPS or security headers information is available. The site uses a plugin to block browser inspect tools, which is a non-standard security approach and may hinder legitimate security assessments. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. Overall, the site does not demonstrate strong security maturity or transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Provide accessible contact information including security incident response contacts.
  5. Remove or reconsider the inspect tool blocking mechanism to improve transparency and usability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Page blocks browser inspect tools with a message requiring users to close inspect tools and refresh. No other content is accessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
The website content is a single page with a message indicating that browser inspect tools are blocked. No business description or services are provided.
Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, WordPress (implied by /wp-content/ path), Divi Inspect Blocker Plugin
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited set

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and blocked by a custom inspect tool blocker.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details provided on the site.
  4. WHOIS data is publicly available and domain is moderately aged.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS information provided.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  7. Site uses WordPress with a plugin to block inspect tools.
  8. No external business-related links or social media profiles found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress and uses Google Fonts for typography. It employs a custom or third-party plugin to block browser inspect tools, which results in minimal accessible content. No analytics, advertising, or tracking scripts are detected. The site lacks visible security headers and DNSSEC is not enabled. Hosting appears to be via NameCheap DNS servers. Performance and accessibility are unknown due to limited content. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level based on CSS media queries. SEO optimization is poor given the absence of meta tags and structured data. Technical debt is likely low but modernization opportunities include adding security headers, HTTPS, and improving content accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with diviblock.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review diviblock.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.