Skip to main content

Security report for divecenter.lv

Akvair · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website divecenter.lv represents a small local scuba diving center named "Akvair" located in Jēkabpils, Latvia. The business offers scuba diving training, leisure activities, and equipment servicing. The site content is primarily in Russian and Latvian, targeting local diving enthusiasts. The business appears to have been established since 2004 based on copyright information, indicating a longstanding presence in the local market. The website is basic in design and functionality, with limited technical sophistication and no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. From a technical perspective, the website uses simple HTML and CSS without modern web technologies or responsive design. There is no evidence of HTTPS or security headers, which poses a risk to user data security and trust. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, indicating low compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Contact information is clearly displayed, but no interactive forms or social media integrations are found. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS, absence of security headers, and no visible security best practices. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting the ability to verify domain registration details. However, the website content and contact details appear consistent with a legitimate small business. Overall, the site scores low to moderate on security and privacy compliance, with recommendations to implement HTTPS, add privacy policies, and improve security headers. Strategically, the business should prioritize improving its digital security and privacy compliance to build trust with customers and meet regulatory requirements. Enhancing the website's technical infrastructure and mobile optimization would also improve user experience and accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching divecenter.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
51
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Akvair operates as a small, local scuba diving center serving the Jēkabpils region in Latvia. Its business model focuses on providing diving training, recreational diving experiences, and equipment servicing. The company targets diving enthusiasts and local customers interested in underwater activities. The market position is regional with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. Revenue streams likely derive from training courses, equipment rentals, and servicing fees. The website's limited digital presence and lack of modern marketing tools suggest a traditional business approach with minimal online growth initiatives. The absence of social media or external links indicates a narrow partnership ecosystem. The company appears stable but could benefit from digital transformation and enhanced online visibility to expand its market reach.

Security posture

The current security posture of divecenter.lv is weak. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes users to potential data interception and attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The lack of incident response contacts or security policies further reduces preparedness for security events. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected in the HTML content, but the site lacks modern security best practices. The WHOIS data unavailability limits domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site requires urgent improvements in encryption, privacy compliance, and security policy transparency to reduce risk and enhance trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Introduce secure and validated contact or registration forms with CSRF protection.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Akvair
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Akvair
Description
Всё для подводного плавания с аквалангом - обучение, отдых, сервис снаряжения
Key services
Scuba diving training, Leisure diving activities, Equipment servicing
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small local scuba diving center based in Jēkabpils, Latvia.
  2. Content is primarily in Russian and Latvian languages.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No forms or interactive elements detected.
  5. No external links or social media profiles found.
  6. No modern web technologies or CMS detected.
  7. No security headers or HTTPS information available.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  9. Contact information including email and phone number clearly displayed.
  10. Website design is basic with absolute positioning and fixed layout.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic HTML and CSS without any detected CMS or JavaScript frameworks. The layout uses absolute positioning with fixed pixel dimensions, indicating outdated design practices. No external scripts, analytics, or tracking technologies were found. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is likely moderate due to simple content but could be improved with modern responsive design and optimization. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content. The absence of HTTPS and security headers represents a technical risk. Overall, the site shows technical debt and modernization opportunities to improve security, performance, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with divecenter.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review divecenter.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.