Skip to main content

Security report for divadlovceletne.cz

Divadlo v Celetné · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Divadlo v Celetné is a cultural and theatrical venue based in Prague, Czech Republic, offering a variety of theatrical performances and cultural events. The website serves as an information and ticketing portal for visitors and theatre enthusiasts, showcasing upcoming programs, news, and partner collaborations. The business operates primarily as a local cultural institution with a focus on community engagement and arts promotion. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.3, utilizing common web technologies such as jQuery and FontAwesome. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content quality, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks visible security headers and publicly available privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, though the presence of official partner logos and active social media accounts supports its authenticity. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for a small cultural institution but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, improved security headers, and transparency in domain registration to strengthen its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching divadlovceletne.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Divadlo v Celetné holds a niche position as a cultural venue in Prague, focusing on theatrical arts and community events. Its competitive advantage lies in its established presence, partnerships with governmental cultural bodies, and a diverse program of performances. The business model revolves around ticket sales, event hosting, and cultural promotion. Target customers include local residents, tourists, and theatre aficionados. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and regular event updates. The partnership ecosystem includes the Ministry of Culture and Prague city authorities, enhancing credibility and funding opportunities. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand digital presence and improve compliance to attract broader audiences and institutional support.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The use of multiple tracking scripts without explicit consent mechanisms may pose privacy risks. Overall, while basic security practices are in place, enhancements are needed to meet modern security and privacy standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.
  5. Increase transparency of domain registration information to strengthen trust and legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Divadlo v Celetné
Description
Divadlo v Celetné is a theatre and cultural venue located in Prague, Czech Republic, offering theatrical performances, events, and cultural programs.
Key services
Theatrical performances, Ticket sales, Cultural events, Venue rental
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery 3.7.1, FontAwesome 5.15.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with consent mechanisms implied

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based cultural venue site with good content and navigation.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  4. Uses multiple tracking and marketing scripts without visible consent banners.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  6. Contact information includes phone numbers and physical address but no email contacts explicitly found.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube is active.
  8. Partner logos indicate official cultural partnerships.
  9. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with up-to-date core and plugin versions. It uses standard web technologies such as jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements. Integration with Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel indicates a focus on user behavior analysis and marketing. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, particularly in loading times and accessibility. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags. However, the lack of advanced security headers and privacy compliance features suggests technical debt in security and regulatory adherence. Opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and enhance user privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with divadlovceletne.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review divadlovceletne.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.