Skip to main content

Security report for displaywindows.com

Panel Graphic Ltd · Manufacturing · United Kingdom

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Panel Graphic Ltd is a UK-based established manufacturer and global supplier specializing in display enhancement window solutions, including coatings, machining, fabrication, printing, and lamination services. The company serves a diverse range of sectors such as automotive, industrial electronics, marine, consumer, medical, aerospace, and LiDAR applications. With over 25 years of experience and multiple prestigious awards including the Queens Award, Panel Graphic holds a strong market position as a trusted partner to blue-chip organizations worldwide. The website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence with detailed product and service information, multimedia content, and client testimonials. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, leveraging modern web technologies and analytics tools, and is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA integration, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are lacking. WHOIS data is unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection, which slightly impacts trust but is mitigated by the company's transparent business information and certifications. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature and credible business with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching displaywindows.com

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
92
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
80
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Panel Graphic operates a B2B business model focused on manufacturing and supplying specialized plastic display enhancement products and services. Their competitive advantage lies in proprietary coatings (Optiguard™), in-house design and prototyping, and comprehensive production facilities. The company targets industries requiring high-performance display protection, including automotive and aerospace sectors. Growth is indicated by recent facility expansions and investments in technology. The partnership ecosystem includes blue-chip clients and industry collaborations. The website content and awards reflect a stable and reputable operation with a focus on innovation and quality. Revenue streams likely derive from product sales, custom fabrication services, and coatings application. Strategic observations suggest continued investment in R&D and facility modernization to maintain market leadership.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a potential area for improvement. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which could impact customer trust and compliance with regulations like GDPR and NIS2. The site uses reputable plugins and keeps core software updated, reducing risk. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by implementing additional headers, publishing security policies, and formalizing incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and WordPress core to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Panel Graphic Ltd
Registration number
3535990
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Panel Graphic Ltd
Description
We're a global supplier of display enhancement window solutions based on Loddon Business Park, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
Key services
Display enhancement windows, Surface coatings, CNC machining, Plastic fabrication, Surface printing, Optical lamination, Calibration & CMM
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.6, WooCommerce 10.7.0, Bootstrap 4.0.0-beta.2, jQuery 3.6.0, FontAwesome 5.8.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA v3, SuperPWA (Progressive Web App), Jetpack, Draw Attention plugin
Frameworks
WordPress, WooCommerce, Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Jetpack, Draw Attention)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, WooCommerce Analytics, Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
WooCommerce Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong branding and consistent design
  3. Multiple social media and external links to reputable platforms
  4. No privacy or cookie policy pages explicitly found
  5. Contact information is clearly presented in header and footer
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information
  7. Use of modern web technologies and plugins
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy or domain status
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It uses Bootstrap for responsive design and integrates multiple JavaScript libraries including jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and WooCommerce Analytics, with tag management through Google Tag Manager. The site employs reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection and uses a Progressive Web App plugin for offline capabilities. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The technical stack is well-maintained but could benefit from enhanced security headers and improved accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the site uses CDN services like MaxCDN and Google-hosted libraries. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with displaywindows.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review displaywindows.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.