Skip to main content

Security report for dinozoopasaule.lv

Other · Latvia

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'DinoZooPasaule' appears to be a Latvian site with a focus on providing information or services related to its brand, as indicated by the site title. The site employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for compliance and marketing purposes. The presence of reCAPTCHA indicates attention to bot mitigation. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy and business registration details. The site implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, indicating GDPR awareness and compliance efforts. No explicit contact or business registration information is visible, which slightly reduces business credibility. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. Overall, the site is functional, compliant with privacy norms, and suitable for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dinozoopasaule.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
83
Average
55
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind the website is likely a small entity operating in Latvia, possibly in the entertainment or educational sector given the domain name and language. The use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools suggests a focus on digital marketing and user engagement. The lack of visible contact information or detailed business descriptions limits deeper insights into market positioning or revenue streams. The site’s integration with platforms like Facebook and Google indicates an intent to reach broad audiences and leverage social media marketing. The business model appears to be content or service provision with monetization potentially through advertising or partnerships.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is used, and CSRF tokens are present, which are positive indicators. The use of reCAPTCHA helps prevent automated abuse. However, no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to enhance security. The cookie consent mechanism is robust, supporting GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. The absence of a public security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness perception.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main navigation.
  3. Add explicit business contact information including email and phone to improve credibility.
  4. Conduct a WHOIS data refresh or use privacy-respecting WHOIS services to ensure domain registration transparency.
  5. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channel for security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Cookiebot, Facebook Pixel, Elfsight widgets, Cloudflare (likely CDN/protection)
Frameworks
Yii Framework (inferred from CSRF meta tags)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by origin-trial meta and Google services)
  • CSRF token present in meta tags
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Elfsight widgets
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses multiple third-party services for analytics and marketing.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed cookie categorization.
  3. No explicit contact or business registration information found on the page.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend audit.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content; suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for analytics, marketing, and compliance. The presence of Yii framework is inferred from CSRF meta tags. The site loads multiple external scripts and stylesheets from reputable CDNs. Mobile optimization is good with viewport meta tags and responsive CSS. Accessibility is basic but present. Performance is moderate given the number of external resources. No CMS was explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not available from the HTML content. The site uses origin-trial meta tags indicating some experimental browser features usage.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dinozoopasaule.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dinozoopasaule.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.