Skip to main content

Security report for dinozoo.lv

Dino Zoo · E-commerce · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dino Zoo is a well-established Latvian e-commerce retailer specializing in pet products including food, accessories, and care items for a variety of animals such as dogs, cats, rodents, and birds. The website demonstrates a professional and user-friendly design with clear navigation and comprehensive product categories targeting pet owners in Latvia. The company provides multiple customer support channels including phone, email, and live chat, enhancing customer engagement and service quality. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Sentry for error tracking, and Google Maps API, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The website is mobile-optimized and includes GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting good privacy practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and error monitoring in place, though additional security headers and explicit security policies could improve the overall security maturity. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits domain registration verification, but the website content and structure suggest legitimacy and professionalism. Overall, Dino Zoo presents a reliable and well-maintained online presence in the pet retail sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dinozoo.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dino Zoo holds a strong market position as a leading pet product retailer in Latvia, offering a wide range of products from multiple brands. The business model is focused on online retail with additional physical store presence implied by the brand. The target customer segment includes pet owners seeking quality pet food, accessories, and care products. The website features promotional banners and product discounts, indicating active marketing and customer engagement strategies. The partnership with related domains such as dinozoopasaule.lv suggests a broader ecosystem or affiliate network. The company emphasizes customer support and product advice, enhancing its competitive advantage. While no explicit financial or founding data is available, the site's scale and content quality imply a large enterprise with significant market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. The use of Sentry for error tracking indicates proactive monitoring of runtime issues. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements, enhancing privacy compliance. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others represents an area for improvement. No security.txt or incident response information is published, which could hinder vulnerability reporting and incident management. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for an e-commerce platform but could benefit from enhanced security policies and headers to mitigate advanced threats.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  3. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to provide clear vulnerability disclosure contact information.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are included.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata to improve user experience and search engine ranking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dino Zoo
Description
Dino Zoo is an e-commerce platform specializing in pet products including food, accessories, and care items for dogs, cats, rodents, birds, and other small animals. The site offers a wide range of brands and product categories targeting pet owners.
Key services
Online pet product sales, Customer support via phone, email, and live chat, Product advice and guides, Promotions and discounts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Sentry (error tracking), Google Fonts, Google Maps API, Naja.js (AJAX framework), Tailwind CSS (inferred from class names), Web Vitals
Frameworks
Naja.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for pet products in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian with clear navigation and multiple product categories.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented in compliance with GDPR.
  4. Contact information including phone and email is clearly provided.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages found.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools observed.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Sentry for error monitoring, and Google Maps API integration. The front-end appears to be built with Tailwind CSS utility classes and Naja.js for AJAX functionality, indicating a contemporary and modular approach to web development. The site is mobile-optimized and includes performance optimizations such as preloading fonts and asynchronous script loading. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility compliance. The site structure supports good SEO practices with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust e-commerce experience but could benefit from further optimization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dinozoo.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dinozoo.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.