Skip to main content

Security report for dinair.lv

AAF / Dinair · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AAF / Dinair is a Latvian company specializing in air filtration solutions, offering services such as analysis, optimization, and monitoring to help organizations save time and money. The website is built on TYPO3 CMS with Bootstrap framework, indicating a moderate level of technical maturity. The content is professional and targeted towards business customers in Latvia, positioning the company as a regional provider of industrial air filtration solutions. Security posture is moderate with no detected security headers or explicit policies, and the absence of WHOIS data limits full trust assessment. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which impacts compliance and trust. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dinair.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the industrial air filtration sector, targeting organizations that require air quality management solutions. The business model appears to be B2B, focusing on providing technical solutions and services. The website content suggests a small-sized enterprise with a regional market focus in Latvia. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data. The lack of contact information and privacy policies may hinder customer trust and regulatory compliance. The company could improve its market position by enhancing transparency and digital presence.

Security posture

The website currently lacks key security headers and explicit security policies, which are important for protecting users and data. HTTPS status is unknown from the provided data, but should be verified and enforced. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a compliance gap with GDPR requirements. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, reducing readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is basic and requires improvements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR.
  3. Include clear contact information and security incident response details.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any vulnerable libraries or forms.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AAF / Dinair
Description
AAF piedāvā gaisa filtrēšanas risinājumus, analīzi, optimizāciju un uzraudzību, lai palīdzētu organizācijām ietaupīt laiku un naudu.
Key services
gaisa filtrēšanas risinājumi, analīze, optimizācija, uzraudzība
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.4.1, TYPO3 CMS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses TYPO3 CMS with Bootstrap framework.
  2. Content is in Latvian language focused on air filtration solutions.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links found in provided HTML snippet.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected in the analyzed content.
  5. No security headers or explicit security policies found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content is accessible.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided content.
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  10. Website appears to target B2B customers in Latvia.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses TYPO3 CMS and Bootstrap 4.4.1, indicating a modern but somewhat dated technology stack. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is minimal with standard meta tags but no advanced structured data or rich snippets. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. The technical infrastructure appears stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dinair.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dinair.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.