Skip to main content

Security report for dimzas.com

Stādaudzētava Dimzas · Other · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stādaudzētava Dimzas is a Latvian family-owned business specializing in plant nursery, landscaping, floristry materials, and consultation services. The website presents a professional image with clear service offerings and customer testimonials, targeting gardeners, landscapers, and florists primarily in Latvia. The e-commerce functionality is supported by WooCommerce, enabling online sales of plants and related products. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and libraries, including Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection and Slider Revolution for visual content. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure; however, the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates room for improvement. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency but does not directly impact the website's operational legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-structured, user-friendly, and trustworthy for its intended audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dimzas.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the horticulture and landscaping sector, offering both products and services. Its business model combines retail sales through an e-commerce platform with professional landscaping and consultation services. The market position appears local to Latvia with a focus on quality and environmentally responsible practices. Customer testimonials and social media presence enhance credibility. The lack of detailed WHOIS data suggests either privacy protection or a registration anomaly, which should be monitored. The company does not display certifications or formal security policies, indicating a small to medium enterprise with potential growth opportunities in compliance and digital maturity.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, indicating basic security awareness. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security contact information is provided, and privacy compliance is minimal with no cookie consent banner detected. The site does not expose sensitive information in the HTML source, and no vulnerable libraries were identified. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced headers, privacy controls, and documented policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed privacy policy to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish an incident response or security contact page to facilitate vulnerability reporting and enhance trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant certifications or trust badges to boost business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stādaudzētava Dimzas
Description
Stādaudzētava Dimzas is a family business engaged in plant nursery, floristry materials supply, landscaping, and consultation services.
Key services
Plant nursery, Landscaping and garden maintenance, Floristry materials production and sales, Consultations and expert advice
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Slider Revolution, Bootstrap, Font Awesome
Frameworks
WooCommerce, WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats (WordPress.com), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Uses modern WordPress ecosystem with WooCommerce for e-commerce.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are referenced but lack detailed GDPR compliance indicators.
  5. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source.
  6. Uses Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection on contact form.
  7. Social media presence includes Facebook and Twitter.
  8. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities, enhanced by popular plugins such as Slider Revolution and WPBakery Page Builder. It uses jQuery and Bootstrap for frontend interactivity and layout. Google Fonts and Font Awesome provide typography and iconography. The site loads external scripts from trusted domains including Google and Facebook for analytics and tracking. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO practices are adequately implemented with meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better form labeling. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business but can be enhanced with modern security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dimzas.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dimzas.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.