Skip to main content

Security report for dimensions.sk

Dimensions Consulting Services s.r.o. · Other · Slovakia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dimensions Consulting Services s.r.o. is a Slovak-based consulting firm specializing in data protection and GDPR compliance services. The company offers Data Protection Officer services, documentation preparation, employee training, and advisory services tailored to organizational needs. Their market position is that of a specialized niche provider focused on helping organizations comply with EU data protection regulations. The website is professionally designed, well-structured, and targets organizations seeking GDPR compliance support. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins such as Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, and Cookie Law Info, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and includes SEO best practices, although some accessibility features could be improved. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting good privacy compliance. However, explicit security headers and incident response policies are not evident, suggesting room for improvement in security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong compliance focus and professional business credibility. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response information, and improving accessibility to further strengthen trust and security culture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dimensions.sk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
30
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the consulting sector with a focus on GDPR and data protection compliance, serving organizations that require legal and operational support in personal data processing. Their business model revolves around providing expert advisory, documentation, and training services. The target customers are primarily businesses and organizations within Slovakia and the EU needing to meet GDPR requirements. The company leverages a professional online presence with clear contact channels and social media engagement, indicating an active partnership and client outreach strategy. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent small business operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with mandatory HTTPS and cookie consent compliance. The absence of security headers and explicit incident response policies indicates moderate security maturity. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The company appears to follow GDPR requirements diligently, including providing data subject rights information in cookie and privacy policies. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly documented, which could be a gap in security culture. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear incident response policy and provide dedicated contact channels for security incidents to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dimensions Consulting Services s.r.o.
Description
Dimensions Consulting Services s.r.o. provides data protection officer services in accordance with the EU GDPR regulation, including documentation preparation, revision, employee training, and consultancy.
Key services
Data Protection Officer services, Documentation preparation and revision, Employee training, Consulting on personal data protection
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Slick Slider, Gutentools theme, Contact Form 7, Cookie Law Info plugin, BSK PDF Manager
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats, Google Analytics (mentioned in cookie policy)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on GDPR and data protection consulting services.
  3. Clear contact information and cookie consent mechanism present.
  4. No terms of service page found.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern theme (Gutentools) and uses popular plugins including Yoast SEO for search optimization, Contact Form 7 for form handling, and Cookie Law Info for GDPR cookie compliance. The presence of jQuery and Slick Slider indicates use of common JavaScript libraries for UI enhancements. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses Jetpack Stats for analytics. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and breadcrumb information. No hosting provider details were identified from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dimensions.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dimensions.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.