Skip to main content

Security report for dimedium.lv

Dimedium Latvija · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dimedium Latvija is a regional company specializing in veterinary and agricultural products, serving veterinary clinics, farms, and pet owners primarily in Latvia. The company offers a broad portfolio including veterinary medicines, animal feed, hygiene products, breeding materials, and farm equipment. Their market position is that of an established regional player with sister companies in Estonia and Lithuania, and a parent group overseeing operations in the Baltics. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as Alpine.js and Livewire, integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form security, and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though some accessibility and SEO improvements could be made. Security posture is decent with HTTPS enforced and CAPTCHA protections, but lacks explicit security headers and published incident response policies. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adding security headers, vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, and incident response information. Privacy compliance is strong with GDPR-aligned privacy and cookie policies including user consent mechanisms. The business credibility is supported by clear contact information, social media presence, and customer testimonials. The domain WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting the ability to fully verify domain registration details. However, the website content and business information appear legitimate and consistent with a reputable regional business. Strategic recommendations include improving security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing accessibility and SEO for better compliance and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dimedium.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dimedium.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for dimedium.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dimedium Latvija operates in the veterinary and agricultural supply sector, targeting veterinary clinics, farms, and pet owners in Latvia. Their business model combines B2B and B2C sales of veterinary medicines, animal feed, hygiene products, and farm equipment. The company benefits from a strong regional presence with sister companies in Estonia and Lithuania and a parent group overseeing Baltic operations. Their competitive advantage lies in a comprehensive product range, local market knowledge, and strong customer relationships evidenced by testimonials and active social media engagement. Revenue streams likely include product sales and service contracts. Growth indicators include active product launches and educational events. The partnership ecosystem includes veterinary clinics and agricultural suppliers. Operationally, the company demonstrates digital maturity with modern web technologies and GDPR compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms against automated abuse. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms indicate good GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved by implementing additional security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program, possibly via a security.txt file.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Dimedium Latvija AS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dimedium Latvija
Description
Dimedium is a company bridging global veterinary practices with Latvian clinics, farms, and homes. They offer a wide range of products including veterinary medicines, animal feed, hygiene and disinfection products, breeding materials, agricultural equipment, instruments, and software.
Key services
Veterinary medicines, Animal feed and supplements, Hygiene and disinfection products, Breeding and genetic materials, Agricultural equipment and instruments, Software solutions for farms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Alpine.js, Livewire, Google reCAPTCHA, Moment.js, Daterangepicker, Slick Carousel, LightGallery
Frameworks
Laravel Livewire
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism with GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (implied by GTM)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Strong presence of GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism.
  4. Multiple contact methods including phone, email, physical address, and contact forms.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks indicating up-to-date technical stack.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data; SSL is enabled.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and YouTube with active posts.
  8. No evidence of security incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies on site.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Laravel Livewire for reactive components, Alpine.js for frontend interactivity, and jQuery for legacy support. It integrates Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for analytics and security. The site uses slick carousel and lightgallery for media presentation. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and CDN usage for some assets. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport settings. SEO is basic with meta tags present but minimal Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support but could be improved. Hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional website but has room for modernization and optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dimedium.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dimedium.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.