Skip to main content

Security report for digitalzentrum-zukunftskultur.de

Mittelstand-Digital Zentrum Zukunftskultur · Other · Germany

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mittelstand-Digital Zentrum Zukunftskultur is a German organization dedicated to supporting small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in their digital transformation journey, focusing on building future-proof corporate cultures. The center offers a variety of services including workshops, events, practical examples, and media resources, all aimed at fostering digital responsibility, sustainability, and the adoption of artificial intelligence technologies. It operates as part of the nationwide Mittelstand-Digital network and is funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWK), positioning it as a trusted partner for SMEs in Germany. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap and jQuery, hosted on Hetzner servers. SEO is well-implemented with Yoast SEO Premium, and the site is mobile-optimized with good performance. Analytics are handled via Matomo with privacy-respecting configurations such as DoNotTrack and disabled cookies, reflecting a strong commitment to user privacy. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs anti-spam measures on forms, but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive GDPR-compliant privacy policy, though cookie consent mechanisms are absent. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and content-rich platform for its target audience of German SMEs. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, implementing cookie consent, and publishing security and vulnerability disclosure policies to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching digitalzentrum-zukunftskultur.de

This scan found 32 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention digitalzentrum-zukunftskultur.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5
Employees
0
Customers
5
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for digitalzentrum-zukunftskultur.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization is well-positioned within the German SME digital transformation ecosystem, leveraging federal funding and a national network to provide free, high-value services. Its business model focuses on knowledge dissemination, capacity building, and practical support in areas like AI readiness, sustainability, and change management. The presence of diverse content formats and active social media channels indicates a mature digital engagement strategy. The lack of direct phone or physical address information suggests a primarily digital or event-based engagement model. Partnerships with government bodies and cybersecurity initiatives enhance credibility and outreach potential.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and privacy-conscious analytics. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represents an area for improvement. The newsletter form includes a security question and GDPR consent, indicating awareness of data protection. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and response. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could benefit from formalized security policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the site against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with EU cookie regulations and enhance user transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide clear incident response contact channels to improve trust and vulnerability management.
  4. Consider creating and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve the security and compliance posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mittelstand-Digital Zentrum Zukunftskultur
Description
Das Zentrum unterstützt kleine und mittlere Unternehmen bei der Entwicklung einer zukunftsfähigen Unternehmenskultur mit Fokus auf Digitalisierung, Künstliche Intelligenz, Nachhaltigkeit, Veränderungsmanagement und digitale Verantwortung.
Key services
Veranstaltungen & Workshops, Weiterbildung & Sprechstunden, Praxisbeispiele & Projekte, Leitfäden, Videos & Podcasts, Artikel & Wissenswertes
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Yoast SEO Premium, jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap 4.0.0, Events Manager Plugin, Mailster Newsletter Plugin, WP YouTube Lyte
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Matomo analytics configured with DoNotTrack and cookie disabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Security question on newsletter form to prevent spam

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Mailster Newsletter
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Strong focus on supporting SMEs in digital transformation and AI adoption.
  3. Professional and consistent branding with clear navigation and multiple content formats.
  4. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond GDPR-compliant privacy policy found.
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed on the homepage or contact page.
  6. Newsletter form includes anti-spam security question and GDPR consent checkbox.
  7. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Spotify.
  8. No visible security headers detected in HTML content; SSL is properly configured.
  9. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure policies found.
  10. No direct contact emails visible except newsletter contact email in privacy statement.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a stable and widely used CMS platform (WordPress) with a modern front-end framework (Bootstrap) and essential plugins for SEO, events management, and newsletters. Hosting on Hetzner provides reliable infrastructure. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts and respects privacy in analytics. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site is mobile-friendly and well-structured with semantic HTML and meta tags supporting SEO. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are notable gaps. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with opportunities for security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with digitalzentrum-zukunftskultur.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digitalzentrum-zukunftskultur.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.