Skip to main content

Security report for digitalsports.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website digitalsports.com is currently inaccessible due to a Sucuri Website Firewall block that restricts access based on the visitor's country IP address. This prevents any direct analysis of the site's content, business information, or technical infrastructure. The domain is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC since 1998, indicating a long-standing registration, but no further business details are available from the site itself. The only accessible content is the Sucuri firewall block page, which includes a link to Sucuri's privacy policy but no company-specific policies or contact information. From a technical perspective, the site is protected by Sucuri's WAF, which is a positive security measure, but the lack of DNSSEC and absence of visible security headers or SSL configuration details limit the ability to fully assess the security posture. The domain status flags indicate protection against unauthorized domain changes, which is a good practice. However, the blocking of access reduces transparency and trustworthiness from a user and analyst perspective. Security posture evaluation is limited due to the block, but the presence of a reputable WAF is a strength. No vulnerabilities or compliance information can be confirmed. The lack of accessible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies suggests potential compliance gaps. Overall, the site scores low on content quality, technical implementation, and business credibility due to inaccessibility. Strategic recommendations include reviewing the WAF country blocking rules to allow legitimate access for analysis and users, enabling DNSSEC to improve DNS security, publishing clear privacy and security policies, and ensuring proper HTTPS and security headers are implemented. These steps would improve transparency, trust, and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching digitalsports.com

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention digitalsports.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
14
Employees
0
Customers
14
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
29%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for digitalsports.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the website being blocked by a security firewall, no direct business information, market positioning, or service details are available. The domain's long registration history suggests an established presence, but without accessible content, insights into business model, revenue streams, or customer segments cannot be determined. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable from the data. The blocking may indicate a security-conscious approach but also limits market visibility and user engagement.

Security posture

The site is protected by Sucuri Website Firewall, which is a strong security control to prevent unauthorized access and attacks. However, the use of country-based IP blocking may restrict legitimate users and complicate incident response. No security headers or SSL configuration details are visible, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies on the site itself indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR or other regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but lacks transparency and comprehensive policy communication.

Recommendations

  1. Review and adjust WAF country blocking rules to avoid blocking legitimate users and analysts.
  2. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies on the website.
  4. Implement and document security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  5. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Sucuri detected. Access Denied page served by Sucuri Website Firewall blocking access based on country IP. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Sucuri Website Firewall

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is completely blocked by Sucuri WAF with country-based IP blocking.
  2. No business or contact information is accessible on the site.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found on the domain itself; only Sucuri's privacy policy is linked.
  4. No forms, scripts, or analytics detected due to blocked content.
  5. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and shows no privacy protection.
  6. Technical and security posture cannot be fully assessed due to lack of access.
  7. Website is inaccessible for analysis; results are limited and mostly unknown.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted with GoDaddy.com, LLC and protected by Sucuri Website Firewall. The HTML content is minimal and only serves a block page, preventing analysis of CMS, frameworks, or scripts. No analytics or marketing tools are detected. The site lacks DNSSEC and visible security headers. Performance, mobile optimization, and SEO cannot be assessed due to blocked content. The technical infrastructure shows a focus on security via WAF but lacks transparency and modern DNS security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with digitalsports.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digitalsports.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.