Skip to main content

Security report for digitalqualitymark.eu

Izba Gospodarki Elektronicznej · E-commerce · Poland

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Digital Quality Mark is a Polish competition platform operated by Izba Gospodarki Elektronicznej that verifies and certifies the quality and effectiveness of SaaS tools, AI solutions, and agencies serving the e-commerce sector. The platform uniquely combines formal evaluation, pitch presentations, and audits to select and promote top-quality technology providers in Poland's e-commerce market. The website is built on WordPress with common plugins and includes a contact form protected by Google reCAPTCHA. While the site uses HTTPS and has a good SSL configuration, it lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partially addressed via an external privacy policy link and GDPR notices on forms. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy image with strong business credibility but could improve in security transparency and privacy mechanisms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching digitalqualitymark.eu

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention digitalqualitymark.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for digitalqualitymark.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform targets e-commerce businesses and technology providers in Poland, positioning itself as a unique quality certification and networking event organizer. It leverages partnerships with industry leaders and auditors to ensure credibility. The business model revolves around competition entry fees, promotion of winners, and facilitating connections between technology providers and e-commerce stores. The presence of testimonials and detailed procedural information indicates a mature approach to market positioning. However, the lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site may limit immediate engagement. The hosting by a reputable Polish provider aligns with the local market focus.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply fully with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Izba Gospodarki Elektronicznej
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Izba Gospodarki Elektronicznej
Description
Digital Quality Mark is a Polish competition verifying the quality and effectiveness of SaaS tools, AI solutions, and agencies offering these technologies for e-commerce. It aims to recommend reliable and high-quality business partners whose services significantly impact e-commerce store development and business results.
Key services
Organizing competition for SaaS, AI tools, and agencies, Verification and certification of quality, Networking and pitch events, Promotion of winners via media and printed magazine
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Contact Form 7, Contact Form 7 Multi Step Pro, Drag and Drop Multiple File Upload Contact Form 7, Google reCAPTCHA v3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Polish e-commerce technology competition platform
  2. Content is rich with detailed competition info, winners, jury, and FAQs
  3. No explicit privacy or security policy pages found on the main domain but privacy policy linked externally
  4. Contact form collects email addresses with GDPR notice referencing Izba Gospodarki Elektronicznej as data controller
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed on the website
  6. No social media links detected in the provided content
  7. Use of WordPress and common plugins with Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection
  8. No visible security headers or advanced security policies published
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response info found
  10. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with jQuery and several plugins including Contact Form 7 and its multi-step extension, as well as drag-and-drop file upload support. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is integrated for spam protection. Hosting is provided by dhosting.pl, a Polish hosting company. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility are basic but functional. There is room for modernization by adopting newer JavaScript frameworks or optimizing asset delivery. No critical technical debt or risks were detected from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with digitalqualitymark.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digitalqualitymark.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.