Skip to main content

Security report for digitalcmo.fr

Other · France

Partial score · DNS & email only

42/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website digitalcmo.fr is currently inaccessible due to a Web Application Firewall (WAF) security challenge page served by Tiger Protect WAF on the o2switch hosting platform. This challenge page blocks access to the actual website content, preventing any meaningful analysis of the business, services, or compliance information. The domain is registered with GANDI since 2011, indicating a mature and legitimate domain age consistent with a stable business presence. However, no business or contact information, privacy policies, or terms of service are accessible on the page. The technical infrastructure includes common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and CryptoJS, but no CMS or marketing technologies are detectable due to the blocked content. Security posture cannot be fully assessed, but the presence of a WAF indicates some level of security protection. Overall, the site’s content quality, privacy compliance, and business credibility cannot be evaluated beyond the WAF challenge.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching digitalcmo.fr

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
60
DNS health
50
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention digitalcmo.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for digitalcmo.fr right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the WAF challenge blocking access, no direct business intelligence data such as company name, services, market positioning, or target audience could be extracted. The domain age and registrar data suggest a legitimate business entity based in France. The hosting provider is o2switch, a known French hosting company. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The lack of accessible content and contact information limits insights into the company’s business model or competitive advantages.

Security posture

The website is protected by Tiger Protect WAF, indicating an active security measure to prevent automated or malicious access. However, no security headers or SSL configuration details are available from the provided data. The site uses HTTPS as indicated by the URL. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the inability to access the site content prevents a full security assessment. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The security posture is therefore unknown but likely moderate due to WAF presence.

Recommendations

  1. Allow legitimate traffic by adjusting WAF rules to reduce false positives and improve user experience.
  2. Publish accessible privacy and cookie policies to enhance compliance and user trust.
  3. Provide clear contact information and business details on the website to improve credibility.
  4. Implement security headers and document security policies to strengthen security posture.
  5. Enable analytics and monitoring tools to gain insights into user behavior and security events.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The page is a security check (WAF challenge) page served by Tiger Protect WAF from o2switch hosting, indicating access is blocked pending verification. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.1, CryptoJS 4.1.1

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by a WAF security challenge page.
  2. No business or contact information is accessible on the page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No forms collecting user data except the WAF challenge form.
  5. External links are mostly to hosting provider and CDN domains.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  7. No social media or contact emails found.
  8. WHOIS data indicates a legitimate domain with no privacy protection.
  9. Content safety is rated safe due to lack of adult or explicit content.
  10. Technical and security observations are limited due to blocked content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard JavaScript libraries (jQuery 3.6.1 and CryptoJS 4.1.1) loaded from CDNJS, indicating some modern technology usage. The hosting provider is o2switch, a French hosting company. The site is currently blocked by a WAF challenge page, which prevents loading of actual business content or metadata. No CMS or frameworks are detectable. The page includes a security challenge form that uses JavaScript to verify legitimacy of visitors. Performance, SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to blocked content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with digitalcmo.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digitalcmo.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.