Skip to main content

Security report for digita.fi

Digita · Telecommunications · Finland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Digita is a Finnish company specializing in building digital infrastructure to enable a modern digital society. The company positions itself as a key national player in telecommunications and digital infrastructure, offering services that support living, entrepreneurship, and societal advancement in Finland. The website reflects a professional digital presence with a focus on clear branding and user experience, targeting Finnish citizens and businesses interested in digital infrastructure. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, and Hotjar for analytics. The presence of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy, although Google Analytics is not fully configured. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers visible in the HTML. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is partially met with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism but lacks a clearly accessible privacy policy in the provided content. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with room for improvement in privacy policy visibility and security header implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching digita.fi

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention digita.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
13
Employees
0
Customers
12
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
38%

6 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for digita.fi.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Digita operates in the telecommunications and digital infrastructure sector in Finland, serving as a foundational service provider for digital society development. Its business model revolves around infrastructure construction and service provision, targeting government, businesses, and citizens. The company leverages partnerships with major platforms like Microsoft Azure, Google, LinkedIn, and Meta for its digital services and marketing. The website's use of advanced consent management and analytics tools reflects a commitment to regulatory compliance and data-driven marketing. The absence of explicit contact information and privacy policy in the HTML suggests these may be located elsewhere or require better visibility. Digita's market position is strong within Finland, supported by consistent WHOIS data and a well-established domain. The company demonstrates a mature digital presence with strategic use of third-party services to enhance user engagement and marketing effectiveness.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS and a robust cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, ensuring compliance with GDPR cookie requirements. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts is managed with user consent, reducing privacy risks. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options in the HTML is a gap that could be addressed to enhance protection against common web attacks. The Google Analytics plugin is present but not configured, which may indicate incomplete analytics setup. No signs of malware, phishing, or exposed sensitive data were found. Incident response and security policy information are not present on the site, which could be improved to demonstrate security maturity. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and clearer security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Configure Google Analytics properly or remove the unused plugin to avoid unnecessary code and potential privacy issues.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  5. Enhance visibility of contact information and security policies to strengthen business credibility and user confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Digita
Description
Digita rakentaa digitaalisen infrastruktuurin avulla Suomesta yhteiskuntaa, joka tarjoaa maailman parhaat mahdollisuudet elää, olla, yrittää ja ylittää itsensä.
Key services
Digital infrastructure construction, Telecommunications services, Broadcasting infrastructure
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Hotjar, Leadoo chat bot, Snoobi analytics
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts with consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Snoobi, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Adform
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Cookiebot, Leadoo
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Leadoo chat bot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided HTML content
  4. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts are used with consent mechanisms
  5. No direct contact information (emails, phones, addresses) found in the HTML content provided
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern scripts and fonts
  7. Security headers are not explicitly visible in HTML but HTTPS is enforced
  8. Google Analytics plugin is installed but not configured with UA code
  9. Business information is consistent with a Finnish telecommunications infrastructure company
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.6.2 with jQuery 3.7.1 and uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, Hotjar for user behavior analytics, and Leadoo for chat functionality. The site loads multiple external scripts from trusted domains, indicating integration with major analytics and marketing platforms. The presence of structured data (JSON-LD) improves SEO and semantic understanding. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential. Mobile optimization is good, and accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks explicit security headers in the HTML, which is a technical risk. The Google Analytics plugin is installed but not configured, suggesting incomplete analytics setup. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be improved by tightening security configurations and completing analytics integration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with digita.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digita.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.