Skip to main content

Security report for digifix.lv

DigiFix · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DigiFix is a Latvian digital printing company established in 2012, providing a range of printing services including quick turnaround digital prints, post-processing options, and product delivery. The company targets both large international corporations and small businesses or private individuals, positioning itself as a reliable local service provider with a focus on quality and customer service. The website reflects a professional business presence with clear contact information and service descriptions. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Google Analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and lack of visible security headers suggest room for improvement in compliance and security posture. The security evaluation shows no critical vulnerabilities but highlights the need for enhanced security best practices and transparency. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and security measures to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching digifix.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DigiFix operates in the digital printing sector, serving a diverse client base including international and local businesses. Its business model focuses on providing digital print products with fast production times and a variety of post-print finishing options. The company leverages online tools such as price calculators and contact forms to facilitate customer interaction. DigiFix maintains an active social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn, supporting its marketing and customer engagement efforts. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized enterprise with a stable market position in Latvia. No parent or subsidiary relationships were identified. The lack of detailed WHOIS data limits deeper verification of business legitimacy and domain ownership. The company could enhance its competitive advantage by improving online privacy disclosures and security transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage implied by external script sources but lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found in the HTML content. The contact form is embedded via iframe, but no details on input validation or secure submission were visible. Absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which may affect the company's readiness to handle security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements in policy transparency, security headers, and incident response preparedness to reduce risk and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Ensure all forms use HTTPS with proper input validation and consider adding CAPTCHA to prevent abuse.
  4. Publish a security.txt file and provide incident response contact information to demonstrate security readiness.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities and improve performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DigiFix
Description
„DigiFix” is a digital printing company founded in 2012, offering quality print products and high-level customer service with a focus on quick production times and a wide range of printing and post-processing options.
Key services
Digital printing of various complexity, Price calculation tools, Product delivery, Post-processing options
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Font Awesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed due to Google Tag Manager and Analytics scripts loaded over HTTPS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the website.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, physical address, and a contact form.
  5. Website uses modern web technologies including Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  6. No explicit security headers or advanced security policies detected in the HTML content.
  7. Content is business-focused, safe, and appropriate for general audiences.
  8. Social media presence includes Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
  10. No certifications or security frameworks mentioned.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, and jQuery, with integration of Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing purposes. Font Awesome is used for iconography, enhancing visual appeal. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and scripts from reputable CDNs, indicating a modern approach to resource loading. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. Accessibility features are minimal but present. SEO optimization is basic with meta description and title tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site does not appear to use a CMS or advanced frameworks. Hosting provider and SSL certificate details are not determinable from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with digifix.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digifix.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.