Skip to main content

Security report for digicreate.be

Dcreate BV · Other · Belgium

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dcreate BV is a communication agency based in Brugge, Belgium, specializing in branding, website development, graphic design, and print services. The company targets businesses seeking to enhance their brand visibility and communication effectiveness. Their market position is that of a local/regional agency with a professional and consistent brand presence. The website reflects a well-structured service offering with clear navigation and relevant content. Technically, the site is built on Umbraco CMS with AngularJS and Bootstrap frameworks, delivering a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism, though some security headers are missing and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, with clear contact details and social media presence supporting business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching digicreate.be

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
100
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the communication and branding sector, providing essential services such as strategy development, website creation, graphic design, and print production. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on small to medium-sized enterprises in the Brugge region. The presence of VAT number and professional contact information indicates legitimate business operations. The website content and social media links suggest active engagement with clients and prospects. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The company appears to maintain a focused portfolio with a strong emphasis on quality and client satisfaction.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent modal, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are publicly available, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security score is good but could benefit from additional hardening and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  2. Add HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and contact information for security issues.
  4. Consider obtaining recognized security certifications such as ISO 27001 to enhance trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Dcreate BV
VAT number
BE 0768.794.779
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dcreate BV
Description
Communicatiebureau in Brugge die jouw merk doet opvallen met ✓ Websites ✓ Logo ontwerp ✓ Huisstijl ✓ Drukwerk ✓ Belettering ✓ Social media ✓ Strategie
Key services
Strategie, Website, Grafisch ontwerp, Print
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AngularJS (angular.website), Bootstrap (navbar classes, offcanvas), Google Fonts, SVG icons
Frameworks
AngularJS, Bootstrap
Platforms
Umbraco CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Cookie consent modal with options to accept, decline, or set preferences
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available due to .be registry restrictions
  3. Professional design and consistent branding
  4. Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  5. No visible security headers in HTML source
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  7. Contact information clearly displayed with phone, email, and address
  8. Social media presence on major platforms
  9. No terms of service page found
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including AngularJS and Bootstrap for frontend, and Umbraco CMS for content management. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate, with no obvious broken elements or errors. Accessibility features are basic but present. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. The site could improve by adding performance optimizations and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with digicreate.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digicreate.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.