Skip to main content

Security report for dienlilijas.lv

Other · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

31/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website dienlilijas.lv is a small-scale Latvian business specializing in the sale of daylilies (dienlilijas) with a focus on a wide variety of cultivars including local and international selections. The business targets gardening enthusiasts and collectors, offering direct sales and delivery services. The site content is rich and relevant, providing detailed horticultural advice and showcasing extensive photographic galleries. Technically, the site relies heavily on jQuery and related plugins for UI and social sharing features but lacks modern CMS or frameworks. Security posture is weak due to absence of HTTPS, security headers, and privacy policies, which poses risks for user data protection and trust. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional and informative but requires significant improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance credibility and user safety.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dienlilijas.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
31

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in a niche horticultural market in Latvia, focusing on daylilies with a strong emphasis on variety and quality. It leverages direct-to-consumer sales with delivery options, indicating a customer-centric approach. The lack of visible certifications or trust badges suggests a small or family-run operation. The website's content and structure indicate moderate digital maturity but limited investment in security and compliance. The absence of email contacts and minimal social media presence may limit customer engagement and growth potential. The partnership with a local web developer (MegaSoft) is noted but no other strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are evident.

Security posture

The website lacks HTTPS, exposing users to potential interception risks. No security headers are detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The use of multiple outdated jQuery plugins could introduce vulnerabilities if not regularly updated. Overall, the security posture is low, with critical recommendations to implement SSL/TLS, security headers, and privacy compliance measures urgently.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all site traffic.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including company email and incident response contacts.
  5. Regularly update all JavaScript libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Pārdod vairāk kā 500 šķirņu dienlilijas no sava dārza, piedāvājot dažādas selekcijas un šķirnes, tostarp Jāņa Vasarieša selekciju, Latvijas un pasaules selekciju. Mērķis ir nodrošināt skaistas dienlilijas stādus dārziem, zālājiem un ainavām.
Key services
Dienliliju stādu pārdošana, Konsultācijas par dienliliju audzēšanu, Piegāde pa pastu un ar kurjeru
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery ColorBox, jQuery Cookie, jQuery Easing, jQuery HoverIntent, jQuery MouseWheel, jQuery AutoEllipsis, jQuery Sharrre, verzaJQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Sharrre social sharing
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about daylilies and related products.
  2. No HTTPS detected in provided HTML content (all resources loaded over HTTP).
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages explicitly found.
  4. Contact phone number is provided but no email address found.
  5. No forms detected on the main page for data collection.
  6. Social media links are placeholders with no actual URLs.
  7. Website uses multiple jQuery plugins and custom scripts for UI and social sharing.
  8. No security headers or SSL information available from provided data.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a classic jQuery-based tech stack with multiple plugins for UI enhancements and social sharing. There is no evidence of a modern CMS or responsive design frameworks, resulting in only basic mobile optimization and accessibility. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern front-end technologies and optimization. The site lacks HTTPS, which is a critical technical deficiency. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but dated and requires modernization to improve security, performance, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dienlilijas.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dienlilijas.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.