Skip to main content

Security report for die-projektoren.de

DIE.PROJEKTOREN – FARYS & RUSCH GBR · Other · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DIE.PROJEKTOREN – FARYS & RUSCH GBR is a small creative agency based in Berlin, Germany, specializing in design and presentation services with a focus on socially and environmentally conscious sectors such as nature and climate protection, social issues, education, and culture. Their offerings include corporate design, illustration, photography, web development, and film production, serving non-profit and cultural clients. The agency has over 20 years of experience, positioning itself as a niche player with a strong commitment to its thematic focus. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 using the Kadence theme and several modern plugins including Toolset Blocks and Bootstrap 4. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, with good accessibility and basic SEO features. Hosting appears to be provided by a German hosting provider, consistent with the business location. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration but lacks explicit security headers and a formal security or incident response policy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is partial; a privacy policy is present and GDPR compliant, but no cookie consent mechanism was found. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with its business purpose. Strategic improvements in security headers, cookie consent, and incident response documentation would enhance its security posture and compliance standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching die-projektoren.de

This scan found 31 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency operates in a specialized market segment focusing on socially responsible and cultural clients, which differentiates it from generalist creative agencies. Its business model revolves around providing comprehensive creative services including design, illustration, photography, web, and film, targeting non-profit organizations and cultural institutions. The company leverages its long-standing experience and thematic focus as competitive advantages. Contact details and social media presence support client engagement. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified, indicating a focused and independent operation. Growth potential lies in expanding digital services and enhancing compliance and security to meet evolving client expectations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options represents a gap in best practices. There is no visible incident response or security policy, which limits readiness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. The security culture appears basic, with room for improvement in formalizing policies and enhancing technical controls to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to ensure full GDPR compliance.
  3. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization for better user experience and reach.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
DIE.PROJEKTOREN – FARYS & RUSCH GBR
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DIE.PROJEKTOREN – FARYS & RUSCH GBR
Description
Agentur für Gestaltung und Präsentation mit über 20 Jahren Erfahrung, spezialisiert auf Natur- und Klimaschutz, Soziales, Bildung und Kultur. Leistungen umfassen Corporate Design, Logos, Flyer, Broschüren, Magazine, Aktionsmaterialien, Illustrationen, Webseiten, Fotografie und Filmdokumentationen.
Key services
Gestaltung, Illustration + Grafik, Logo + CI, Fotografie, Web, Film
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Kadence Theme, jQuery 3.7.1, Toolset Blocks, Bootstrap 4, MediaElement.js, AOS (Animate on Scroll), Jarallax
Frameworks
Bootstrap 4
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and focused on creative agency services.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins and themes.
  8. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  9. No vulnerabilities or security issues visible in source code.
  10. WHOIS data is limited but domain appears consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with a well-maintained tech stack including Kadence theme, Toolset Blocks, Bootstrap 4, and various JavaScript libraries for UI enhancements. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. Mobile optimization is good, and the site uses standard fonts and responsive layouts. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve SEO metadata and accessibility compliance. Hosting is consistent with the business location, supporting low latency and regional compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with room for modernization in security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with die-projektoren.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review die-projektoren.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.