Skip to main content

Security report for dhs.gov

Department of Homeland Security · Government · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain dhs.gov is associated with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, a large government entity established in 2002. The website is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) blocking access, presenting an 'Access Denied' message. This prevents any meaningful content or metadata extraction. The domain is legitimate, with a long registration history and appropriate privacy protection for a government site. However, no public-facing privacy, cookie, or security policies are detectable from the blocked content. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare protection but lacks DNSSEC. Due to the blocked content, the website's digital maturity and user experience cannot be assessed. Security posture is unknown but likely robust given the government context, though improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and publishing security headers are recommended. Overall, the site is low risk but inaccessible for detailed analysis, and strategic recommendations focus on improving transparency and accessibility for compliance and trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of dhs.gov. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dhs.gov

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Department of Homeland Security operates as a critical government agency focused on national security. Its market position is essential and unique, serving the public sector with no direct commercial competitors. The business model is government-funded and service-oriented, targeting citizens, government partners, and security stakeholders. The domain age and registrar information align with a stable, long-term presence. No subsidiary or partner domains were identified from the limited data. The lack of accessible content limits insights into growth indicators or partnership ecosystems. The agency likely maintains a complex operational structure with high security requirements.

Security posture

The current security posture cannot be fully evaluated due to the WAF blocking access. The use of Cloudflare indicates a strong perimeter defense. However, the absence of DNSSEC and visible security headers suggests areas for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or compliance gaps can be identified from the blocked page. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, which may impact transparency. The domain registration is privacy protected, which is typical and justified for government domains. Overall, the security posture is presumed strong but lacks publicly accessible documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain name system security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement and expose security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide accessible contact and incident response information for transparency and user support.
  5. Review WAF rules to allow legitimate access for analysis and user experience improvements.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Access Denied page served by Cloudflare indicating WAF or security challenge blocking access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
Department of Homeland Security
Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by Cloudflare WAF with an Access Denied message
  2. No actual website content available for analysis
  3. No metadata, forms, or contact information found in the HTML
  4. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity
  5. Domain is old and likely legitimate given government association
  6. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  7. No security or incident response information publicly available
  8. No analytics or advertising scripts detected due to blocked content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is protected by Cloudflare, indicating a modern security infrastructure. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of metadata or scripts in the accessible content limits technical assessment. The site currently returns an Access Denied page, preventing evaluation of performance, mobile optimization, SEO, or accessibility. No CMS or frameworks are detectable. Hosting is via Cloudflare's network, which provides DDoS mitigation and CDN services. The technical debt and modernization opportunities cannot be assessed due to blocked content. Ensuring proper configuration to balance security and accessibility is recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dhs.gov. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dhs.gov.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.