The website dh-partners.com currently serves only a minimal HTML page that immediately redirects visitors to a /lander path, with no visible content, metadata, or business information. The domain is registered and resolves to two IP addresses, but lacks a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which significantly impacts its security posture and trustworthiness. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact or business details are available on the site. Technically, the site shows poor performance and lacks modern web standards and security best practices. Overall, the website appears to be in an early or placeholder state, limiting its utility and credibility for users and business partners.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
No HTTPS encryption
GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data
What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
44
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention dh-partners.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for dh-partners.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Due to the absence of visible business content, metadata, or structured data, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived from the current website. There are no indications of company name, services, target audience, or market positioning. The domain registration is consistent but provides no additional insights. Without further information, the business model, revenue streams, or partnerships cannot be assessed.
Security posture
The security posture of dh-partners.com is weak. The lack of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support exposes users to potential interception and undermines trust. No security headers or DNS security features such as DNSSEC or CAA records are implemented. The site does not present any privacy or cookie policies, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. These gaps represent significant risks if the site were to handle sensitive data or user interactions.
Recommendations
Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the site immediately.
Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security.
Enable DNSSEC and configure CAA records to improve DNS security and certificate issuance control.
Enhance website content to provide clear business information, contact details, and user navigation to improve credibility and user experience.
Technical notes
Notes
The website infrastructure is minimal, serving a single HTML page with a JavaScript redirect and no additional resources. DNS records show two A records and no AAAA, MX, or TXT records. DNSSEC and CAA are not enabled, reducing DNS security. SSL is not configured, and no TLS protocols or cipher suites are supported. No CMS, frameworks, or analytics tools are detected. Performance metrics are unavailable due to the lack of content. The site lacks mobile optimization, accessibility features, and SEO metadata. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data provided.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with dh-partners.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dh-partners.com.