Skip to main content

Security report for dgrv.de

Other · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.dgrv.de represents a German organization likely related to cooperatives or non-profit sectors, as inferred from the domain and content language. The site uses modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap 4 and Font Awesome 6, indicating a moderate level of technical maturity. Hosting is provided by Pironet NDH, a known German hosting provider. The website content is accessible without any WAF or security challenge blocking access. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, as well as clear contact information, which are important for compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with a Content-Security-Policy header present and HTTPS enforced, but additional security headers and policies would improve the overall security stance. The domain WHOIS data shows standard hosting name servers but lacks detailed registrant information, limiting full trust assessment. Overall, the website is safe for general audiences and professionally designed but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer business contact details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dgrv.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dgrv.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for dgrv.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization behind www.dgrv.de appears to be a small to medium-sized entity operating in Germany, possibly in the cooperative or non-profit sector. The business model likely focuses on providing information, services, or advocacy related to cooperatives or similar entities. The website does not reveal detailed market positioning or revenue streams but serves as an informational platform. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The lack of explicit business contact details and policies suggests a focus on informational presence rather than direct commercial transactions. The hosting by a reputable German provider supports operational stability. The absence of analytics or marketing tools indicates a low emphasis on aggressive digital marketing or user tracking.

Security posture

Security measures on the website include HTTPS enforcement and a Content-Security-Policy header, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of other common security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of a security policy or incident response contact channels limits the organization's readiness to handle security incidents publicly. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add additional security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Consider adding a security policy and incident response contact channels to demonstrate security readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and frameworks to avoid vulnerabilities and maintain technical currency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.0.0, Font Awesome 6.4.2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Content-Security-Policy header present
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern frontend technologies like Bootstrap and Font Awesome.
  2. Content is in German language with no privacy or cookie policies explicitly found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Security headers are minimal but include a Content-Security-Policy.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
  6. WHOIS data shows domain status as 'connect' with hosting provider name servers.
  7. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bootstrap 4.0.0 and Font Awesome 6.4.2, indicating a reliance on well-established frontend frameworks. The presence of a Content-Security-Policy header shows attention to security best practices. Hosting is managed by Pironet NDH, a German hosting provider, which suggests reliable infrastructure. The site appears mobile optimized with responsive design elements. SEO and accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS or backend technologies were explicitly detected in the provided content. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading or technical debt. The site would benefit from enhanced meta tags, structured data, and accessibility improvements to increase digital maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dgrv.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dgrv.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.