Skip to main content

Security report for dfat.gov.au

Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade · Government · Australia

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) operates as the primary government agency responsible for managing Australia's international relations, trade, and diplomatic efforts. The website serves as an authoritative source of information for Australian citizens, international partners, businesses, and travelers, providing comprehensive content on foreign affairs, trade agreements, development programs, consular services, and travel advice. The site is well-branded, professionally designed, and consistent with government standards, reflecting its enterprise-level stature within the government sector. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10 and hosted on GovCMS, a platform tailored for Australian government entities. It integrates modern tools such as Google Tag Manager and ReadSpeaker for analytics and accessibility. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. However, performance metrics are unavailable, and some technical debt is evident in the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which critically impact security posture. From a security perspective, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and TLS support is a significant vulnerability, exposing users to potential data interception and undermining trust. While security headers like X-Content-Type-Options and X-Frame-Options are correctly implemented, the lack of HTTPS and session security mechanisms lowers the overall security score. Privacy compliance is partial, with a comprehensive privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism despite the use of tracking scripts. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is a high-quality government portal with excellent content and user experience but suffers from critical security shortcomings that must be addressed urgently to protect users and maintain trust. Strategic improvements in SSL/TLS deployment, privacy compliance, and security best practices are recommended to elevate the site's security posture and compliance standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dfat.gov.au

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DFAT holds a dominant position as Australia's official foreign affairs and trade authority, operating under the Australian Government. Its business model is that of a government agency focused on diplomacy, trade facilitation, development aid, and consular services. The website supports these functions by providing detailed information, policy updates, and resources for multiple stakeholders including citizens, businesses, and international partners. The presence of partner domains such as Austrade and Tourism Australia indicates a collaborative ecosystem supporting Australia's international economic and diplomatic objectives. The agency leverages digital tools for outreach and analytics but currently lacks advanced privacy and security controls, which may impact stakeholder trust if not remediated. Growth indicators include active content updates and engagement with global trade frameworks. The site’s strategic value lies in its authoritative content and government backing, positioning it as a trusted source in its sector.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which are fundamental for secure communications. Although several security headers are implemented, the lack of HTTPS means data transmitted between users and the site is vulnerable to interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No OCSP stapling or session resumption mechanisms are enabled, further reducing security and performance. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerable libraries, but the missing encryption is a critical flaw. Privacy compliance is incomplete, with no cookie consent mechanism despite tracking scripts in use. The presence of a vulnerability disclosure policy is a positive indicator of security awareness. Overall, the site requires urgent remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhancement of privacy controls to meet modern security standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated protocols to secure data in transit.
  3. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and inform users about tracking.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  5. Regularly audit and update security headers and conduct vulnerability assessments to maintain a strong security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
Registration number
ABN: 47 065 634 525
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern CMS platform (Drupal 10) integrated with GovCMS, which is designed for Australian government websites. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and ReadSpeaker for accessibility, indicating a focus on user experience and data-driven insights. Hosting appears to be on Amazon AWS with Cloudflare DNS services, providing scalability and reliability. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured navigation. However, the lack of SSL/TLS support is a major technical deficiency that undermines the otherwise solid infrastructure. Performance data is missing, suggesting a need for monitoring and optimization. The site’s technical debt includes outdated or missing security configurations that should be prioritized for remediation to ensure operational security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dfat.gov.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dfat.gov.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.