Skip to main content

Security report for dezinfa.lv

SIA Dezinfa · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dezinfa is a Latvian pest control company offering integrated pest management services for residential and business clients. Their service portfolio includes monitoring and control of insects, rodents, birds, fumigation, ozonation, and bird control. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for marketing and tracking purposes. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and anti-bot measures like reCAPTCHA, but lacks explicit security headers and privacy compliance documentation. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site presents a credible business with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dezinfa.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets both home and business sectors in Latvia, emphasizing safety and quality in pest control. Their business model is service-oriented with a focus on integrated pest management programs. The presence of a client portal indicates a digital approach to customer service. The website content is localized in Latvian with Russian language support, indicating regional market focus. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The company appears to be a small-sized local player with a consistent brand presence and professional service descriptions.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes anti-bot protection via Google reCAPTCHA. Tracking scripts are loaded asynchronously to optimize performance. However, the site lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or incident response contacts were found, which could improve vulnerability disclosure and incident handling. Privacy and cookie policies are missing or not easily discoverable, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for security vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear contact information for data protection officer or security contacts.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Dezinfa
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Dezinfa
Description
Dezinfa provides pest control services including monitoring and control of insects, rodents, birds, and other pests for homes and businesses, using integrated pest management programs.
Key services
Pest monitoring and control, Fumigation, Ozonation, Bird control
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Swiper.js, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, reCAPTCHA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based pest control service site in Latvian language.
  2. Content is well structured with clear service categories for home and business.
  3. Multiple external tracking and analytics scripts are used.
  4. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found in the scanned content.
  5. Contact phone number and client portal link are clearly provided.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  7. No security.txt or incident response information found.
  8. No explicit certifications or compliance statements found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.4.5 with Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization. It uses modern JavaScript libraries including Swiper.js for interactive sliders. The site loads multiple external scripts for analytics and marketing, including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and reCAPTCHA. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses semantic HTML5 elements. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous script loading. No hosting provider information was identified from the content. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but maintains basic usability standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dezinfa.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dezinfa.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.