Skip to main content

Security report for deva-fm.cz

DEVA FM, s.r.o. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DEVA FM, s.r.o. is a Czech manufacturing company specializing in the development and production of protective clothing for firefighters, rescuers, military, police, and energy and oil industries. Established since 1993, the company emphasizes high-quality materials and modern production technologies, serving a specialized and professional target audience. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a professional online presence, leveraging WordPress and the Avada theme for content management and presentation. Technically, the site is well-structured with good SEO and mobile optimization, though some security best practices such as security headers are missing. The security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA integration, but lacks explicit privacy and terms of service documentation. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and business information appear consistent and professional. Overall, the site is safe, well-designed, and targeted at a general professional audience.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of deva-fm.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching deva-fm.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in manufacturing protective clothing for emergency and security sectors, positioning itself as a trusted supplier with nearly 30 years of experience. Its business model focuses on product development, client customization, and leveraging advanced materials. The website targets professional organizations such as fire departments, military, police, and industrial clients. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern but does not contradict the company's stated history. The company appears to maintain a moderate digital maturity with a focus on content quality and SEO, but could improve transparency with privacy and security policies. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are visible, which may affect customer engagement. The company does not appear to have publicly listed subsidiaries or partners on the website.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA on forms, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of explicit privacy and incident response policies suggests room for improvement in compliance and incident readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and conducting regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance web security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish and disclose incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to demonstrate security maturity.
  4. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to facilitate customer and security communications.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DEVA FM, s.r.o.
Description
Vyvíjíme a vyrábíme oděvy pro hasiče, záchranáře, armádu, policii, energetický a ropný průmysl, pracujeme se špičkovými materiály a nejmodernější výrobní technologií.
Key services
development and manufacturing of protective clothing, customized client service, use of advanced materials and production technologies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Avada theme, jQuery, Google Fonts, WooCommerce, YouTube iframe API, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  6. Website uses modern WordPress theme and plugins
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
  9. Good SEO and structured data implementation
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme, incorporating jQuery, Google Fonts, WooCommerce, and YouTube APIs. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate with some heavy multimedia content such as background videos. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The absence of detected security headers and incomplete WHOIS data are technical risks. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has opportunities for modernization and enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 46/100High34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with deva-fm.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review deva-fm.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.