Skip to main content

Security report for detentiongirls.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DetentionGirls.com is an adult entertainment website specializing in a niche series featuring teen girls with behavioral issues in a boarding school setting. It operates on a subscription-based business model and is part of the larger Nubiles Porn Network, which includes multiple related adult content sites. The website offers video streaming, photo galleries, and model profiles targeting adult consumers interested in this genre. The domain was registered in 2019, aligning with the series launch date, and is managed through a reputable registrar without privacy protection, indicating transparency in domain ownership. Technically, the site employs modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, Mustache.js, and HTMX, with a CMS identified as EdgeCMS. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS for secure communications. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, representing areas for security enhancement. The site collects user data via forms for membership registration and login, but lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance concern. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates basic best practices such as HTTPS and CSRF tokens but would benefit from improved DNS security, security headers, and transparent privacy compliance measures. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available. The absence of contact information and official business credentials reduces business credibility and user trust. Overall, DetentionGirls.com is a functional adult content platform with moderate technical maturity and security posture but lacks comprehensive privacy compliance and business transparency. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching detentiongirls.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates within the adult entertainment industry, focusing on a niche series under the Nubiles Porn Network umbrella. Its subscription-based revenue model targets adult consumers seeking specialized content. The network's extensive portfolio of related sites suggests a well-established partnership ecosystem, enhancing market reach. The domain age and content launch date are consistent, indicating stable operations since 2019. However, the lack of visible company contact details and compliance documentation may limit growth potential and user trust. The site’s integration with multiple partner domains reflects a collaborative business strategy leveraging cross-promotion within the adult content market.

Security posture

DetentionGirls.com exhibits a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and CSRF protection in forms, which are essential for protecting user data. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to potential DNS spoofing and clickjacking attacks. The lack of published privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident, which could delay mitigation of security incidents. Overall, while foundational security measures are in place, the site requires enhancements in DNS security, header implementation, and privacy compliance to strengthen its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Establish and disclose an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues.
  5. Add verified company contact information and business credentials to improve business credibility and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
DetentionGirls.com is an adult entertainment website featuring a series focused on teen girls with behavior problems in a boarding school setting. The site offers videos, photos, and models primarily targeting adult audiences interested in this niche.
Key services
Adult video streaming, Photo galleries, Membership access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery 3.6.0, Mustache.js, HTMX, Popper.js, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • CSRF tokens in forms
  • Use of crossorigin attributes on scripts and fonts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult entertainment subscription site focused on a niche series.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  3. Multiple forms collect user email and password for membership registration and login.
  4. Site uses HTTPS and modern frontend technologies but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers.
  5. Part of a larger adult content network with many partner sites linked.
  6. No company contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
  7. No social media links or official business registrations visible.
  8. No security or incident response policies disclosed.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Mustache.js for templating, and HTMX for dynamic content loading. The CMS appears to be a proprietary or custom system named EdgeCMS. The site is mobile-optimized and uses lazy loading for images and videos to improve performance. External resources are loaded with crossorigin attributes to support security. However, the site lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers, which are technical risks. Performance is moderate, with some heavy media content typical for video streaming sites. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no structured JSON-LD detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for security and SEO improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with detentiongirls.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review detentiongirls.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.