Skip to main content

Security report for design-zentrum-hamburg.de

Design Zentrum Hamburg · Other · Germany

Partial score · DNS & email only

49/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Design Zentrum Hamburg is a prominent non-profit initiative dedicated to supporting and promoting the design industry in Hamburg. It serves as a hub for events, exhibitions, workshops, and funding programs aimed at fostering creativity and professional growth within the local design community. The organization operates under the umbrella of the Hamburg Kreativ Gesellschaft, positioning itself as a key player in Hamburg's creative ecosystem. The website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence, offering clear navigation and comprehensive information about its services and initiatives. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including Matomo for analytics, Google Maps API, and PrivacyWire for cookie consent management, all hosted on a CMS platform identified as ProcessWire. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, security headers present, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is robust, featuring a comprehensive privacy policy, cookie consent mechanisms, and GDPR adherence. However, the site lacks a publicly available security policy or incident response contact details, which could enhance trust and preparedness. Overall, the domain registration data is limited but consistent with the business identity, supporting the legitimacy of the website. The site is safe for general audiences, with no adult or questionable content detected.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching design-zentrum-hamburg.de

This scan found 15 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
0
Average
59
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Design Zentrum Hamburg occupies a leading position in Hamburg's design sector, functioning as a facilitator and promoter of design-related activities. Its business model centers on providing value through events, workshops, exhibitions, and funding programs, targeting designers, creatives, and industry professionals. The organization benefits from strong partnerships with sister initiatives under the Hamburg Kreativ Gesellschaft umbrella, enhancing its reach and resources. Revenue streams likely include event fees, space rentals, and funding program sponsorships. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on community engagement and professional development, with clear calls to action for participation and collaboration. The presence of social media links and active content updates suggest ongoing engagement with its audience. Strategic observations highlight the organization's role as a vital node in Hamburg's creative economy, with potential growth opportunities in expanding digital offerings and enhancing security transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including Content-Type, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and Permissions-Policy. The use of PrivacyWire for cookie consent and email obfuscation techniques further strengthen privacy protections. No exposed credentials, vulnerable libraries, or security misconfigurations were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information represents a gap in transparency and preparedness. The site does not provide a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, which are recommended best practices. Overall, the security measures in place are solid for a non-profit organization, but improvements in policy communication and incident readiness would enhance the security culture and trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by detailing data retention policies and privacy practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Design Zentrum Hamburg
Description
Als Förderinitiative, Ideen-Inkubator und Schauplatz für Projekte sind wir Hamburgs erste Adresse für die Designbranche.
Key services
Events and networking, Consulting and workshops, Exhibitions, Funding programs, Space rental, Future Fashion Lab
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Matomo Analytics, Google Maps API, PrivacyWire (cookie consent), Lottie animations, EmailObfuscation module
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • Email obfuscation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to the design industry.
  3. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie consent regulations.
  4. Clear contact information including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  7. WHOIS data is limited but domain appears consistent with business identity.
  8. Social media presence on Instagram and LinkedIn is active and linked.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the ProcessWire CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as Lottie for animations and Matomo for privacy-focused analytics. Google Maps API is integrated with consent-based loading to comply with privacy regulations. The site employs PrivacyWire for cookie consent management, ensuring GDPR compliance. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and responsive design for mobile optimization. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced with ARIA landmarks and keyboard navigation improvements. SEO is well addressed through meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured navigation. Hosting appears to be managed by or affiliated with kreativgesellschaft.org, indicating a stable infrastructure. Technical risks are minimal, though continuous monitoring and modernization efforts are advisable to maintain performance and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with design-zentrum-hamburg.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review design-zentrum-hamburg.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.