Skip to main content

Security report for derberan.de

DERBERAN Print und Web · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DERBERAN Print und Web is a small German service provider specializing in print and web services since 2004. The company offers a range of services including print materials, typesetting, internet presence, newsletters, web snippets, print processing, web hosting, and homepage maintenance. The website reflects a niche local business with a consistent brand and professional presentation. Technically, the site uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and integrates Usercentrics for cookie consent and Google Ads for marketing. Hosting is provided by Alfahosting, consistent with the domain's nameservers. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS likely enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or terms policies. Overall, the site is accessible, safe, and moderately optimized for mobile and SEO.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching derberan.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention derberan.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for derberan.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets small to medium clients needing print and web solutions, operating a service-based model with direct client engagement via contact forms. The long domain age supports business legitimacy and market presence. Marketing efforts include Google Ads and tracking, indicating active customer acquisition strategies. The absence of detailed contact info and formal policies suggests room for maturity in compliance and customer trust. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The company operates independently with a focus on quality service delivery in the print and web sector.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic to moderate. The site uses HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, which are positive indicators. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency. The use of third-party scripts like Usercentrics and Google Tag Manager introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were detected in the provided content.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add explicit contact information including company email and phone number for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate security transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DERBERAN Print und Web
Description
Bereits seit 2004 biete ich der Kundschaft Drucksachen, Satz, Internetpräsenzen, Newsletter, Webschnippsel, Druckabwicklung, Webhosting, Homepage-Pflege und erweiterte Dienstleistungen an. | Ivo Beran
Key services
Print materials, Typesetting, Internet presence, Newsletter, Web snippets, Print processing, Web hosting, Homepage maintenance, Extended services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, CloudZoom, Usercentrics (cookie consent), Google Tag Manager, Google Ads
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (Google Ads and Usercentrics scripts loaded via HTTPS)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Ads conversion tracking
Marketing tools
Usercentrics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the site.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Usercentrics with high confidence.
  4. Contact information is limited to a contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Use of Google Ads and Tag Manager indicates marketing and tracking activity.
  6. Technical stack is based on common libraries like jQuery and Bootstrap.
  7. Hosting is provided by Alfahosting as per nameservers.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown but likely present.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Content is professional and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a traditional tech stack using jQuery and Bootstrap, which are stable but somewhat dated technologies. The site loads external scripts for cookie consent and marketing, indicating integration with modern compliance and advertising tools. Hosting is managed by Alfahosting, a known German hosting provider. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization considered good. SEO and accessibility are basic but functional. The site does not appear to use a common CMS, suggesting a custom or static site approach. There is opportunity to modernize the tech stack and improve technical SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with derberan.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review derberan.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.