Skip to main content

Security report for dema-it.com

DeMa IT · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DeMa IT is a small German IT service provider based in Cologne, specializing in web design, software and app development, and IT services. The company targets business customers seeking tailored IT solutions and emphasizes customer satisfaction and long-term relationships. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and partner logos. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Laravel backend, Cloudflare DNS/CDN, and standard frontend frameworks. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly but lacks some advanced accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Privacy compliance is good with a GDPR-compliant privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism, though no terms of service or incident response policies are visible. Overall, the website is trustworthy and functional with moderate security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dema-it.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector focusing on IT services for businesses, offering app and software development alongside web design. Founded in 2018, it maintains a regional presence in Germany with a small business size. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on customized solutions and customer retention. Partnerships with other companies are showcased via logos, enhancing credibility. The absence of public certifications or detailed compliance documentation suggests a focus on practical service delivery rather than formal certifications. The company leverages social media channels for marketing and customer engagement. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts and ongoing IT support services.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, which provides a baseline of security. The domain is protected against unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could mitigate common web attacks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which limits transparency in security management. Cookie consent is implemented with samesite=lax cookies, supporting privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Consider adding terms of service to clarify user and client agreements and legal protections.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DeMa IT
Description
DeMa IT aus Köln ist ein IT-Dienstleister, der sich auf Webdesign, Software- und App-Entwicklung sowie IT-Service spezialisiert hat. Sie bieten individuelle IT-Lösungen für Unternehmen, von der Planung bis zur Umsetzung.
Key services
App-Entwicklung, Software-Entwicklung, Webdesign, IT-Service vor Ort
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, FontAwesome, MDBootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status
  • cookie consent with samesite=lax

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and targets German-speaking business customers.
  3. No explicit email addresses or phone numbers found in HTML content; contact likely via contact form.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented with explicit user acceptance.
  5. Social media presence on YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter is linked.
  6. No explicit privacy or security certifications displayed.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  9. Website uses HTTPS with Cloudflare DNS and CDN.
  10. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern frontend technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, FontAwesome icons, and MDBootstrap components. The backend likely uses Laravel framework as indicated by cookie consent script naming. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and DNS services. The site loads media assets such as videos and images with lazy loading for performance optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO meta tags are properly configured. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution. Performance is moderate with no obvious bottlenecks. Accessibility is basic and could be improved with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dema-it.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dema-it.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.