Skip to main content

Security report for deliman.net

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ninja Casino operates as an online gambling and sportsbook platform primarily targeting Finnish and Nordic markets. The website offers casino games and sports betting services, integrating affiliate marketing mechanisms as indicated by URL parameters. The platform is built as a modern single-page application with extensive use of JavaScript frameworks and progressive web app technologies, ensuring good mobile optimization and user experience. The technical infrastructure includes integrations with Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Firebase, and third-party payment and chat services such as Trustly and Ladesk. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented; however, the absence of visible security headers and public privacy policies indicates room for improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable from the standard .com registry, which slightly reduces trust but may be due to privacy protection or alternative registration. Overall, the site is professionally designed and functional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching deliman.net

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
40
Email security
98
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ninja Casino positions itself as a competitive player in the online gambling sector, focusing on casino and sportsbook offerings. Its business model relies on direct player engagement and affiliate marketing channels. The platform targets adult users interested in gambling, primarily in Finland and potentially other Nordic countries. The integration with payment processors like Trustly and sportsbook SDKs suggests a mature operational setup. The lack of publicly available company registration or contact information limits full business transparency. The website's moderate size and consistent branding indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a focus on digital-first customer acquisition and retention strategies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place. The use of third-party services for payments and live chat is handled via secure script loading. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a notable gap. No direct evidence of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data was found in the provided content. The lack of published privacy policies, terms of service, and incident response contacts reduces compliance and readiness indicators. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but requires enhancements in transparency, header implementation, and documented policies to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main site.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including support and incident response email addresses to improve trust and compliance.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to proactively identify and mitigate risks.
  5. Enhance GDPR compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights in privacy documentation.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Ninja Casino is an online gambling platform offering casino games and sportsbook betting services targeting Finnish and other European markets.
Key services
Online casino games, Sportsbook betting, Promotions and bonuses
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (implied by SPA structure), Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Firebase, Workbox (service worker), Trustly (payment integration), Altenar sportsbook SDK
Frameworks
React (SPA)
Platforms
Progressive Web App
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Live agent chat with secure script loading
  • Use of service workers with Workbox

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Firebase Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a modern SPA with extensive JavaScript usage.
  2. No WHOIS data available from standard .com registry lookup.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Multiple third-party integrations for analytics, payments, and live chat.
  7. Content is focused on online gambling and sportsbook services targeting Finnish users.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; recommend adding them.
  9. No visible forms in the provided HTML snapshot; likely rendered dynamically via JavaScript.
  10. No social media links found in the provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built as a modern single-page application likely using React or a similar JavaScript framework, supported by a progressive web app architecture with service workers managed by Workbox. It leverages multiple third-party services for analytics (Google Analytics, Firebase), marketing (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot), payments (Trustly), and live chat (Ladesk). The site is optimized for mobile devices with multiple Apple touch icons and startup images. Performance is moderate with deferred JavaScript loading and preconnect hints to critical domains. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. The absence of visible security headers and public policy documents indicates technical debt in compliance and security transparency. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with deliman.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review deliman.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.