Skip to main content

Security report for delidia.de

Delidia · E-commerce · Germany

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Delidia operates as a German-based e-commerce platform specializing in organic delicacies, offering products directly from producers with a focus on social responsibility by involving people with disabilities in packaging. The website is built on the Shopify platform using the Flex theme, indicating a modern and scalable technical infrastructure. The site is optimized for mobile and desktop users with good SEO practices and moderate performance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers present, although explicit privacy and cookie policies are missing, which impacts compliance. No signs of WAF or content blocking were detected, and the site content is safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching delidia.de

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
75
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Delidia targets consumers interested in organic and specialty food products, leveraging an online retail model with direct delivery. The business benefits from Shopify's ecosystem, including integrated payment and marketing tools like Klaviyo and Facebook Pixel. The lack of visible contact details and formal policies suggests room for improvement in transparency and customer trust. The company appears to be a small-sized niche player in the German organic food e-commerce market, with a socially conscious brand identity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and security headers, and no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries detected. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited maturity in security governance. Compliance with GDPR is not clearly demonstrated, and cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which could pose regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy pages to improve legal transparency and user trust.
  3. Provide clear contact information including dedicated security and incident response contacts.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Delidia
Description
Feinkost Online Shop für Bio-Delikatessen direkt vom Erzeuger, verpackt von Menschen mit Behinderung, Lieferung in 1-2 Tagen
Key services
Online sales of organic delicacies, Delivery service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Shopify, jQuery, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Shopify Flex theme
Platforms
Shopify
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Shopify secure checkout
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Shopify Analytics, Klaviyo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Klaviyo
Marketing tools
Klaviyo Email Marketing, Shopify Upsell Cart Drawer
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Shopify-based German organic delicatessen e-commerce store
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the HTML content
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content
  4. Uses multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools including Klaviyo and Facebook Pixel
  5. Good HTTPS and security headers configuration
  6. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  7. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences
  8. Technical implementation is modern and uses Shopify Flex theme
  9. Lacks explicit GDPR compliance indicators and cookie consent mechanisms
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages Shopify's Flex theme and CDN hosting, ensuring a reliable and scalable infrastructure. Use of modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery and integration with marketing tools such as Klaviyo and Facebook Pixel indicate a mature digital marketing setup. Performance is moderate with preloading and preconnecting optimizations. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and explicit SEO metadata beyond basics. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in privacy and compliance-related technical implementations are needed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with delidia.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review delidia.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.