Skip to main content

Security report for delfield.com

Delfield · Manufacturing · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Delfield is a well-established manufacturer specializing in commercial refrigeration, fabrication, and serving systems, operating under the Welbilt brand umbrella. The company targets commercial foodservice businesses and distributors, offering a broad product range including refrigerators, freezers, and custom fabrication solutions. Their market position is strengthened by a 15-year consecutive ENERGY STAR Partner of the Year Sustained Excellence Award, reflecting a commitment to energy efficiency and sustainability. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Azure Application Insights for telemetry and analytics. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and accessible, with good SEO practices and a cookie consent mechanism indicating privacy awareness. However, some security best practices like security headers are missing, and WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is good with clear privacy and cookie policies. The absence of a public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy is a gap. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front, but improvements in security headers and transparency in domain registration would enhance trust. Strategically, Delfield should focus on enhancing security policies visibility, publishing vulnerability disclosure information, and improving WHOIS transparency to strengthen legitimacy and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching delfield.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Delfield operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on commercial kitchen equipment with a strong emphasis on refrigeration and fabrication. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive product line and long-standing recognition for energy efficiency. The business model is B2B manufacturing and distribution, targeting commercial foodservice providers. Revenue streams likely include product sales, parts, service, and training programs. The company maintains a robust partnership ecosystem under Welbilt, leveraging brand strength and shared resources. Growth indicators include continuous awards and active social media engagement. The company’s operations are supported by a professional website with clear navigation and customer support features.

Security posture

The security maturity level of Delfield’s website is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and telemetry is collected via Azure Application Insights, indicating some level of monitoring. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which limits transparency and readiness perception. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting compliance with GDPR and other regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with enhanced headers and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file or dedicated security contact information to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
  4. Enhance WHOIS data transparency or use a registrar that provides public WHOIS information to improve domain legitimacy trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Delfield
Description
Delfield is a manufacturer specializing in refrigeration, fabrication, and serving systems, offering a broad product line including refrigerators, freezers, heated units, and more. They are part of Welbilt brands.
Key services
Refrigeration products, Fabrication services, Serving systems, Customer service and parts support, Training programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Azure Application Insights
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Azure Application Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Azure Application Insights
Marketing tools
Azure Application Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment
  4. Strong branding and consistent business information
  5. Good privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanism
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  7. Use of Azure Application Insights for telemetry and analytics
  8. Multiple social media channels linked
  9. No contact emails explicitly found in HTML content
  10. Phone numbers and physical address clearly displayed in footer
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with jQuery, Bootstrap for responsive design, and FontAwesome for icons. Azure Application Insights is integrated for telemetry and analytics, indicating a proactive approach to monitoring. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags and JSON-LD structured data for breadcrumbs. Performance is moderate with gzip compressed assets. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete WHOIS data, which could impact trust and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with delfield.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review delfield.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.