Skip to main content

Security report for dekra-certification.es

DEKRA Certificación · Other · Spain

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security and GDPR outside view.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DEKRA Certificación is a leading European certification body accredited by ENAC, specializing in audits and certifications across quality, environmental management, occupational health and safety, sustainability, and cybersecurity sectors. The company offers a broad portfolio of certifications including ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, and industry-specific certifications such as SERMI and TISAX, targeting businesses aiming to improve compliance and operational excellence. Their market position is strong, supported by recognized accreditations and a comprehensive service offering tailored to various industries in Spain and beyond. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like Nuxt.js and Vue.js, hosted on Azure, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Matomo, Hotjar, and Google Tag Manager. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. However, the SSL/TLS configuration shows no enabled TLS protocols, which is unusual and should be addressed for secure communications. From a security perspective, the site implements robust HTTP security headers including HSTS, CSP, and X-Frame-Options, but the lack of TLS 1.2 or higher and the disabled X-XSS-Protection header indicate areas for improvement. No explicit security policy or incident response information is publicly available, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. The site complies with GDPR, featuring comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, DEKRA Certificación presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with strong business credentials and technical maturity. Addressing the TLS configuration and enhancing security transparency would further strengthen their security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dekra-certification.es

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
80
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DEKRA Certificación operates as an essential entity in the certification and auditing industry, focusing on quality, environmental, safety, sustainability, and cybersecurity certifications. Their competitive advantage lies in ENAC accreditation and a wide range of ISO and industry-specific certifications. The business model revolves around providing certification services to diverse sectors including aeronautics, food, automotive, construction, cosmetics, energy, manufacturing, public sector, commerce, ICT, and logistics. Revenue streams likely include certification fees, audits, and consulting services. The target customers are businesses seeking compliance and operational excellence. Growth indicators include recent certifications and sustainability services. The partnership ecosystem includes hosting and media delivery partners such as e-Spirit hosting domains. Strategic observations highlight a strong market presence in Spain with potential for expansion leveraging digital channels and comprehensive service offerings.

Security posture

The current security maturity of DEKRA Certificación's website is good, with strong implementation of security headers and a valid SSL certificate issued by a reputable CA. The use of HSTS with includeSubDomains enhances protection against protocol downgrade attacks. However, the absence of enabled TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or higher) is a critical issue that could expose users to insecure connections or compatibility problems. The disabled X-XSS-Protection header suggests a missed opportunity to mitigate cross-site scripting attacks at the browser level. No public security policy or incident response information is available, indicating a potential gap in security transparency and preparedness. GDPR compliance is evident through detailed privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is solid but requires immediate attention to TLS configuration and enhanced security communication to users.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 or higher protocols to ensure secure and modern encrypted connections.
  2. Activate and configure the X-XSS-Protection header to provide additional browser-based XSS protection.
  3. Implement and publish a clear security policy and incident response plan to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update the Content Security Policy to cover all external resources and reduce risk of injection attacks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework stack, primarily Nuxt.js and Vue.js, styled with Tailwind CSS, and hosted on Microsoft Azure. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including Matomo, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn SDK, and SnapEngage, indicating a mature digital marketing and analytics strategy. The CMS used is e-Spirit FirstSpirit, which supports structured content management and localization. Performance metrics indicate fast load times and good mobile optimization. The site uses advanced security headers but lacks enabled TLS protocols, which is a technical risk. The infrastructure is well architected for scalability and content delivery, leveraging cloud hosting and CDN partners. Opportunities exist to modernize SSL/TLS configuration and enhance security headers for improved resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dekra-certification.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dekra-certification.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.