Skip to main content

Security report for dejustudija7.lv

Deju skola - Agita un Valērijs Mironovi · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Deju Studija 7 is a Latvian dance school operated by Agita and Valērijs Mironovi, offering dance education primarily focused on children from 5 years old, sports dance enthusiasts, couples, and corporate clients. The website presents a professional and well-structured digital presence built on WordPress, integrating SEO and analytics tools such as All in One SEO and Google Analytics. The business targets local markets with specialized dance training and event performances, including wedding waltz lessons and corporate dance demonstrations. Technically, the site is modern and mobile-optimized, though performance is moderate and accessibility is basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which is a notable gap for GDPR adherence. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is credible and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dejustudija7.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small, essential entity in the education and entertainment sector, specifically dance instruction and performance. Its market position is local with a focus on personalized dance education and event services. Revenue likely derives from tuition fees, private lessons, and event bookings. The target audience includes children, dance hobbyists, couples preparing for weddings, and corporate event organizers. The website's use of structured data and SEO plugins indicates an intent to maintain visibility and professionalism. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. Growth potential may be tied to expanding digital presence and formalizing compliance and security practices.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but no explicit consent mechanisms are visible. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  2. Add security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response transparency.
  4. Include incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses to support security communications.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Deju skola - Agita un Valērijs Mironovi
Description
Deja ir visa mūsu dzīve, tāpēc mēs palīdzēsim Jums iemācīties dejot Piedāvājam Deju apmācība bērniem no 5 gadu vecuma, sporta deju apmācība visu kvalifikācijas klašu dejotājiem, individuālās deju nodarbības pāriem, sporta deju vai balles deju apguvei, deju demonstrējumi korporatīvos pasākumos, un protams, kāzu valsis.
Key services
dance training for children, sports dance training for all qualification classes, individual dance lessons for couples, sports and ballroom dance training, dance performances for corporate events, wedding waltz training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.2, PHP (implied by WordPress), Google Analytics (MonsterInsights plugin), Google Tag Manager, All in One SEO plugin, Simply Schedule Appointments plugin
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights, Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based dance school site with professional design and clear contact info
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
  4. Uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking
  5. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content
  7. No incident response or security contact information published
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.6.2, leveraging popular plugins for SEO (All in One SEO), analytics (MonsterInsights), and scheduling (Simply Schedule Appointments). It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive navigation and modern CSS usage. Performance is moderate, likely due to plugin overhead and external script loading. Accessibility features are basic, with some screen-reader text and semantic HTML elements. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features, representing technical debt and modernization opportunities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dejustudija7.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dejustudija7.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.