Skip to main content

Security report for deform.cc

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at app.deform.cc is currently inaccessible due to a Vercel Security Checkpoint that verifies the visitor's browser before granting access. This checkpoint acts as a Web Application Firewall (WAF) mechanism, effectively blocking direct access to the site's actual content. Consequently, no business-related information, metadata, or contact details are available for analysis. The site appears to be hosted on the Vercel platform and uses the Astro framework, but no further technical or business insights can be derived from the blocked content. The security checkpoint indicates a focus on protecting the site from automated or malicious traffic, but it also prevents comprehensive external analysis. Due to the lack of accessible content, no privacy policies, cookie policies, terms of service, or security policies are detectable. There are no visible forms, contact information, or social media links. The absence of these elements limits the ability to assess the site's compliance, security posture, or business credibility. The content safety rating is safe, as no explicit or adult content is present on the checkpoint page. Overall, the site’s security posture is difficult to evaluate beyond the presence of the Vercel security checkpoint. The domain's WHOIS data was not provided, preventing domain age or registrant legitimacy analysis. Given the blocking mechanism, the AI overall score is low, reflecting the inability to perform a full assessment. For a thorough evaluation, access to the actual site content or cooperation from the site owner is necessary.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching deform.cc

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence data is available due to the content being blocked by the Vercel security checkpoint. The absence of company name, description, services, or market positioning prevents any meaningful analysis of the business model, target audience, or competitive landscape. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable. The site appears to be in a protected state, possibly indicating a development or staging environment or a security-conscious deployment.

Security posture

The security posture is partially observable only through the presence of the Vercel Security Checkpoint, which suggests the use of Vercel's built-in security features to mitigate automated threats and bot traffic. However, no security headers, SSL/TLS configuration details, or vulnerability disclosures are accessible. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries, but this cannot be confirmed due to the blocked content. Incident response contacts and security policies are not found. Overall, the security maturity cannot be fully assessed but the checkpoint indicates a baseline security control.

Recommendations

  1. Provide public access or a staging environment without WAF blocking for external security and compliance assessments.
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies accessible without security challenges.
  3. Include contact information and security incident response contacts on publicly accessible pages.
  4. Implement and expose security headers and SSL/TLS best practices to improve security posture visibility.
  5. Consider adding vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files to enhance transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Vercel detected. Page is a Vercel Security Checkpoint indicating browser verification and blocking access to actual content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, SVG
Frameworks
Astro, Vercel
Platforms
Vercel

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked behind a Vercel security checkpoint.
  2. No actual business content or metadata is accessible.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or forms detected.
  5. No security headers or certificates information available.
  6. Only external link found is to vercel.link for security checkpoint fix.
  7. Page uses Astro framework and is hosted on Vercel.
  8. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  9. No social media or company branding elements found.
  10. Content safety is rated safe due to lack of content.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses the Astro framework and is hosted on Vercel, indicating a modern JavaScript-based static or serverless deployment. The HTML includes SVG-based loading spinners and obfuscated JavaScript likely related to the security checkpoint. No CMS or third-party analytics/tracking scripts are detected. The page is minimal and designed solely for browser verification, lacking SEO metadata or structured data. Performance and accessibility cannot be evaluated due to the blocking. The technical stack is modern but the checkpoint limits functional and content analysis.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with deform.cc. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review deform.cc.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.