Skip to main content

Security report for deepwhite.lv

Deep White · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Deep White is a communication management and public relations agency based in Latvia, offering services focused on communication and PR. The website is built using modern frontend technologies such as Nuxt.js and Vue.js, indicating a contemporary digital infrastructure. The site is professionally designed with good mobile optimization and user experience, though it lacks comprehensive metadata and structured data for enhanced SEO and social media integration. Security posture is weak due to the absence of security headers and no visible SSL/TLS configuration details. Privacy and cookie policies are not present, which may impact compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Contact information and incident response details are also missing, limiting direct communication and security incident handling capabilities. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and transparency to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching deepwhite.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention deepwhite.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
40%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for deepwhite.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency targets businesses and organizations seeking communication and public relations services, operating as a small service provider in the communications sector. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on communication management and PR. The website content is consistent with the brand and professionally presented, though it lacks explicit trust indicators such as certifications or client testimonials. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content. The absence of detailed business registration or VAT information limits deeper business credibility assessment. The digital presence is modern but could benefit from enhanced SEO and richer content to improve market positioning and competitive advantage.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to missing security headers, no visible HTTPS enforcement confirmation, and lack of privacy and cookie policies. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing immediate risk from form-based vulnerabilities, but also indicating limited user interaction capabilities. The absence of incident response contacts and security policies suggests a gap in security governance and readiness. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection frameworks is not evident. Recommendations include implementing standard security headers, ensuring HTTPS is enforced, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear security incident contacts to improve security posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and mitigate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Deep White
Description
Deep White is a communication management and public relations agency.
Key services
Communication management, Public relations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Nuxt.js, Vue.js, Matter font family, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected in the HTML content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. Website uses modern frontend technologies (Nuxt.js, Vue.js) and custom fonts.
  5. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the HTML content.
  6. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  7. No external links or domains explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  8. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  9. Content is professionally styled and mobile optimized.
  10. Limited metadata and no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found in the provided HTML snippet.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Nuxt.js and Vue.js frameworks, indicating a modern JavaScript single-page application architecture. Custom fonts and Swiper.js for UI elements are used, enhancing design and interactivity. The site appears mobile optimized with responsive design techniques. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML content. Performance is moderate based on the complexity of the frontend stack and absence of explicit performance optimization indicators. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. SEO optimization is minimal due to lack of meta descriptions, Open Graph tags, and structured data. Technical risks include missing security headers and unknown SSL configuration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with deepwhite.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review deepwhite.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.