Skip to main content

Security report for deck.gallery

Deck.Gallery® · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Deck.Gallery® is a niche curated platform specializing in showcasing beautifully designed presentation decks, slides, keynotes, and guidelines. The website targets designers, marketers, and professionals seeking high-quality presentation materials. It operates primarily as a content curation and newsletter subscription service, with user submissions enabled via external forms. The market position is focused on quality and aesthetics rather than volume or commercial sales. Technically, the site uses modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with fetch API for form submissions. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO practices but lacks advanced accessibility features. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no explicit security headers are detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are present. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection or query failure, which is typical for small curated sites. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of deck.gallery. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching deck.gallery

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Deck.Gallery® operates as a small content curation business in the design and presentation niche. Its business model revolves around providing curated decks and a newsletter to a targeted audience of professionals. The platform leverages third-party services for newsletter management and form submissions, indicating a lean operational model. The presence of social media links and a contact email suggests engagement with its community. The lack of detailed business registration or physical address information limits deeper business intelligence. The site’s focus on design quality and curation positions it well within a specialized market segment, with potential for growth through expanded content and community features.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. The newsletter form includes client-side rate limiting but lacks visible server-side protections. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR or similar regulations. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common but limits transparency. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited formal security governance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader audience inclusivity.
  5. Consider using a domain-specific contact email to enhance business credibility and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Deck.Gallery®
Description
Explore curated, beautifully designed presentation decks, slides, keynotes, and guidelines, all chosen for their exceptional design quality.
Key services
Curated presentation decks, Newsletter subscription, User deck submissions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Fetch API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Umami
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Loops newsletter service, Tally form service
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found
  3. Contact email is provided but is a personal domain (senyil.com) rather than deck.gallery domain
  4. Newsletter subscription uses third-party service Loops
  5. Forms use modern fetch API with rate limiting implemented client-side
  6. Social media presence on Twitter/X is linked
  7. No phone numbers or physical addresses found
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  9. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content
  10. No explicit GDPR compliance statements found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with modern fetch API for asynchronous form submissions. It uses third-party services for newsletter management (Loops) and form submissions (Tally), indicating reliance on external platforms for key functionalities. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter card tags. Performance is moderate with no explicit hosting provider identified. No CMS or frameworks are detected, suggesting a custom or static site approach. The lack of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small curated content site but has room for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with deck.gallery. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review deck.gallery.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.